Criminal Misc.Application No. ... vs Public Prosecutor For
Judges:
29 March, 2012·#. Heard Mr.Omprakash Shah for applicant.#. The applicant is the accused of offence under Sections 9, 22, 23 and 29 of NDPS Act. His previous regular bail application being Criminal Misc. Application No.3754 of 2002 was permitted to be withdrawn on 29.6.2002 on the ground that the accused has filed ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kumudrai vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·By filing this application, applicant/appellant/ original complainant has made following prayers:"(A) YOUR LORDSHIP may be pleased to Admit and Allow this Application and further be pleased to permit the applicant to serve the notice issued by this Hon'ble Court on the Opponent/Respondent No. 2 by a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Madhuben vs The
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1. The present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the applicants-original defendants nos. 3 to 8 to quash and set aside the impugned order passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Anand dated 13/05/2011 below Exh. 74 in Specia...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jamiat vs The
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) On 09.03.2012 when this petition was pressed for hearing, learned counsel, Mr. D.P.Joshi for the petitioner, prayed for time for ascertaining latest position with respect to the grievance raised in the petition. At his request, therefore, the petition was a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Lakhibai vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Notice returnable on 08.05.2012.(K.M.THAKER,J.) Suresh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Una vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) NOTICE, returnable on 18TH APRIL, 2012.Learned AGP, Mr. Rakesh Patel, waives service of notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Direct service is permitted qua respondent Nos. 4 and 5.(D.H.WAGHELA, J.) (MOHINDER PAL, J.) Umesh/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chief vs Vinod
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Mr. Chintan P.Champaneri, learned advocate appears for the respondents and prays for time as he intends to put proper appearance. To enable him to do so, S.O. to 23.4.2012.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Criminal Misc.Application No. ... vs Mr Pr Abichandani
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1.The main appeal is already ordered to be expedited. The applicant had not pressed for bail on earlier occasion, as can be seen from the order of this Court passed on 28th February, 2001 in the main appeal. The applicant is involved in offences punishable under Sections 392, 397, 452 and 342 read w...
High Court Of Gujarat
Criminal Misc.Application No. ... vs Mr.V.M.Pancholi
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Rule. Mr. V.M.Pancholi, learned A.P.P. waives service of rule on behalf of State.2.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State.3.There are in all six accused who have preferred Cri.Misc.Application No. 1816/02 before the Sessions Court which came to be rejected. Out of t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Aarifbhai vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1. At the joint request, the matter is taken up for final disposal.2. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties respectively. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed with a prayer to quash and set aside the proceedings of Criminal Complaint being ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.