Icici vs Subedar
Judges:
29 March, 2012·In spite of earlier order dated 01.03.2012, no action has been taken by the learned advocate for the appellant. Therefore, the present appeal stands dismissed for default. No order as to costs.(K.S.JHAVERI,J.) pawan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramagauri vs Unknown
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Registry is directed to ISSUE NOTICE upon the petitioner, making it returnable on 12/6/2012, informing him that as his advocate has joined judiciary, he is required make alternate arrangement and engage another lawyer.In the meantime, Registry is directed to call for the record and proceedings of th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ronak vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Leave to add complainant as party-respondent No.2 is granted. Cause title be amended forthwith.Issue notice returnable on 3.4.2012.Learned APP waives service on behalf of the State.Direct service is permitted qua the private respondent.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Misc.Civil Application No. 1998 ... vs Mr Hm Prachchhak For
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D.S.SINHA)1.Ms. Mita Panchal, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, informs the Court that Mr.N.D.Nanavati, the learned Senior Advocate, who is to argue the matter, is actually on his legs in a matter before another Bench, and is unable to see this matter. Sh...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhirendra vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1. This application has been filed with a prayer to implead Special Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department, as party respondent No.6 in Special Civil Application No.11995/2003.2. Heard Mr.Jayesh Patel, learned advocate for Mr.A.J.Patel, learned advocate for the applicants (original petitioners) and...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vanrajsinh vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Permitted to file affidavint-in-rejoinder on behalf of the applicants and the relvant papers annexed thereto.Having considered submissions advanced on behalf of both the sides and perusing the papers annexed with this application, it transpires that detailed examination and consideration is required...
High Court Of Gujarat
Surendra vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·It is submitted by learned APP, Mr.L.B.Dabhi, for the applicant that trial of the case is over. Fax copy of letter dated produced by learned APP is ordered to be produced on record.In view of the fact that trial is over, the grievance raised by the applicant that trial was not going on would not sur...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ashokbhai vs Tejabhai
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Heard.Rule.Learned advocate Mr. Dagli for the applicant submitted that the original complainant has preferred one Criminal Revision Application No.53 of 2012 before this Court. Therefore, he requests that this matter may be heard with Criminal Revision Application No.53 of 2012.Request is granted.(Z...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ganchi vs At
Judges:
29 March, 2012·At the request of Shri Kakkad, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants, Registry is directed to issue fresh notice of RULE upon the respondent making it returnable on 23/04/2012. Respondent be served through Registered Post A.D. over and above regular service at the cost of the applic...
High Court Of Gujarat
Charutar vs Parents
Judges: Mr Justice Vijay A J Desai, Vijay Manohar A J Desai, A J Desai
29 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) We have heard Mr. Dhaval C. Dave, learned Counsel assisted by Mr. P.J. Jadeja for the appellants, Mr. Umang Vaghela, learned Advocate for Mr. A.J. Yagnik, appearing for Respondents No. 1 to 199 and 203, learned Advocate Mr. Sunit S. Shah assisted by Mr. Dipe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.