Pravinbhai vs M. Sahai
Judges:
14 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Learned counsel Mr. A. B. Munshi appearing for the appellant states that the present appeal is not arising from the common order from which OJ Appeal Nos.14, 16, 17 of 2009 and 44 of 2011 have been filed. He submits that the present appeal is wrongly tagged ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nagindas vs Gujarat
Judges:
14 March, 2012·Notice returnable on 10th April 2012.(K.M.THAKER, J.) jani Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ghogha vs State
Judges:
14 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. We have heard Ms.Mamta Vyas, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Ms.Jirga Jhaveri, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.2. Since there is no dispute on facts for deciding the present Appeals, therefore, with the co...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hirabhai vs State
Judges:
14 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE)1. The petitioner, corpus and respondent No.2 are present before us. We have heard learned advocates, Ms.Amrita Ajmera, learned APP, Mr. Kodekar, Mr.Ruturaj Oza and Mr. Tushar Chaudhary for parties.2. The corpus is aged about 20 years. She has come in company of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Jamanbhai
Judges:
14 March, 2012·1. The respondent no.1 herein, original applicant, had preferred claim petition being M.A.C.P. No.438/1995 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Rajkot at Gondal claiming total compensation of Rs.3.00 Lacs in connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 05.10.1995 involving ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Naynaben vs State
Judges:
14 March, 2012·1. Leave to amend so as to correct the name of respondent No.2.2. Learned advocate for the petitioner has request for permission to withdraw the petition with a view to approaching appropriate authority.3. Having regard to the details mentioned in the petition and the reason which appears to have le...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Firozkhan
Judges:
14 March, 2012·1. The petitioner - Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation herein referred to as 'Corporation' by way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has challenged the legality and validity of the order dated 01.10.2001 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Junagadh in R...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nattional vs Baluben
Judges:
14 March, 2012·For the insurance company learned advocate Mr.Mehta appearing seeks time to furnish the addresses of those respondents who have not so far been served the notice. Time is granted with specific direction that no further time shall be granted by this Court.The matter is adjourned to 5th April, 2012.(M...
High Court Of Gujarat
Paschim vs Chief
Judges:
14 March, 2012·Mrs.Vasavdatta Bhatt, learned Counsel appearing for the opponents has tendered Affidavit-in-Reply. The same is taken on record. Mr. Mishra, learned Advocate for the applicant seeks time to file Rejoinder. To enable him to do so, S.O. to 26.03.2012.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.