Utkarsh vs O
Judges:
16 March, 2012·In view of the order passed in Company Application No. 475 of 2011 this application may also be heard along with the said application.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Municipal Corporation Of City Of Ahmedabads vs Gujarat Electricity Board Now Uttar Gujart Vim Com Ltd Opponents
Judges: M R Shah
16 March, 2012·1. Present Civil Revision Application under section 115 of th4 Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the petitioner - original respondent / judgement debtor to quash and set aside the impugned order dtd.26/7/2011 passed by the learned Small Causes Court, Ahmedabad below application Ex.3...
High Court Of Gujarat
The Ahmedabad Mercantile Co Opbank Ltd & 1S vs Simmi Associates & 3
Judges: M R Shah
16 March, 2012·1. Rule. Mr.M.S.Shah, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of Opponent No.1 and Mr.K.V.Shelat, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of Opponent Nos.2 and 3.2. The present Civil Revision Application u/s.115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has bee...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs Asit B Joshi For Appellant(S) :
Judges:
16 March, 2012·The present First Appeal has been filed by the Appellant - Original Defendant under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure being aggrieved with the impugned judgment and order rendered by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Valsad, Camp at Vapi in Special Civil Suit No.78 of 2007 dated 22.2.2011 on t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Navinchandra vs Gopaldas
Judges:
16 March, 2012·Rule.To be heard with Special Civil Application No. 10023 of 2007. Office is directed to place Special Civil Application No. 10023 of 2007 along with present matter.By way of ad-interim relief, the impugned award is stayed by recording the statement of learned advocate for the petitioner that amount...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sanjivkumar vs Secretary
Judges:
16 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)1. The matter is listed at Sr. No. 2 in the board of 16.3.2012. The matter was called out in the first round. Learned Advocate Mr Bharat Shah for the appellant was not present. Instead of dismissing the matter for default, the matter was kept back though ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dipakbhai vs State
Judges:
16 March, 2012·Heard Mr. Desai, learned advocate for the petitioners.2. At the outset, it is necessary to mention that Mr. Desai, learned advocate for the petitioners, requested for circulation of present matter at 11.00 a.m. today. It was mentioned by Mr. Desai that permission for urgent circulation for today was...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hansraj vs Naran
Judges:
16 March, 2012·1. The appellants herein, original claimants, had preferred M.A.C.P. No.02/1994 u/s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act claiming total compensation of Rs.5.00 Lacs in connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 17.08.1993 in which Amit, the son of the appellants herein, had expired. The said...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramaben vs Oral
Judges:
16 March, 2012·Respondents party-in-person Mr. K.N. Solanki and Mr. K.P. Joshi are present in the Court. However, respondent party-in-person Mr. M.B. Patel is absent. It is stated that respondent party-in-person Mr. M.B. Patel is busy in social function at his house and therefore, he could not remain present. The ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vardhman vs State
Judges:
16 March, 2012·At the request of Mr. Gupta, learned advocate for the petitioner hearing of this matter is adjourned to 19.3.2012 so as to enable the petitioner to place on record the relevant documents to justify the request for permission (in respect of concerned students) to appear, as an interim arrangement, in...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.