Divisional vs Harnarayan
Judges:
21 March, 2012·Rule returnable on 05.09.2012. Mr. Paritosh Calla, learned advocate for the respondent no. 2 waives service of notice of Rule.Interim relief in terms of para 8(C ) is granted on the following conditions:The respondent workman shall be paid his retirement dues as if the order of the Tribunal is not s...
High Court Of Gujarat
Umarbhai vs State
Judges:
21 March, 2012·Issue notice returnable on 12.4.2012.Learned APP waives service on behalf of the State.Direct service is permitted qua other respondents.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Aminnudin vs State
Judges:
21 March, 2012·Upon instruction from the applicants, the learned advocate for the applicants seeks permission to withdraw this application at this stage with liberty to approach the concerned Court to avail remedy under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.Permission is granted.This application stands disposed of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chiko vs State
Judges:
21 March, 2012·[1] If trial is not completed within a period of 9(nine) months, in that event, applicant will be at liberty to file fresh bail application.[2] In view of above, learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw present application. Permission is granted. Application stands disposed of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rasiklal vs Gajraben
Judges:
21 March, 2012·At the request of Ms.Renu Singh, learned advocate appearing for Mr.Y.N. Ravani, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the contesting respondent, S.O. to 2nd April, 2012. Affidavit-in-reply, if any, to be filed on or before 27th March, 2012 and Rejoinder, if any, to be filed on or before 30th March...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bismillakhan vs State
Judges:
21 March, 2012·1. This application has been filed praying to replace/amend paragraph Nos. 9 and 10 of the main petition.2. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner. The prayer of the petitioner cannot be granted. However, it will be open for the petitioner to file an Additional Affidavit.3. With the above observa...
High Court Of Gujarat
Triumph vs Co-Operative
Judges:
21 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) This is an application for condonation of delay of 78 days in filing Letters Patent Appeal.Heard learned counsel for the parties.Considering the contents of the application, it cannot be said that the delay caused in filing the appeal has remained totally un...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gsrtc vs Devendra
Judges:
21 March, 2012·1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 23.12.2003 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [Main], Panchmahal at Godhra in M.A.C.P. No. 1014 of 1995, whereby the said claim petition was partly allowed and the original claimants were awarded total compensation of R...
High Court Of Gujarat
Khivsingh vs State
Judges:
21 March, 2012·Mr.Supehia, learned advocate for the petitioner, has submitted that present petition is identical to Special Civil Application No.3443 of 2012 and that identical issues are involved in the matter. He also submitted that the said Special Civil Application No.3443 of 2012 has been admitted vide order ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharatsinh vs State
Judges:
21 March, 2012·Heard Mr.R.C.Kakkad, learned advocate for the applicant. He has submitted that during the hearing of Ex.11 application in Sessions Case No.57 of 2008 on 28.7.2010 learned Judge has passed order, fixing for hearing. On 19.3.2011, the application is allowed by the learned Judge. Mr.Kakkad submitted th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.