Vanrajsinh Chandubha Gohil vs State Of Gujarat & 12
Judges:
22 March, 2012·1. The endorsement in the cause list reveals that respondent no.3 is unserved.2. However, considering the cause title, respondent no.3 appears to be Police Inspector, "A" Division Police Station, Rajkot City, Rajkot.3. Mr.K.P.Raval, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents-State waiv...
High Court Of Gujarat
S.M vs State
Judges:
22 March, 2012·When the matter is called out and taken up for hearing, learned advocate for the petitioner is not present. S. O. to 27/04/2012.(K.M.THAKER, J.) (ila) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sangada vs Zalod
Judges:
22 March, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner-workman has challenged the judgement and order dated 10.07.2009, passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Godhra, in Reference(LCG) No.733 of 1998(old), Reference(LCG) No. 112 of 1998(New), whereby the Reference Court has rejected the said Reference.2...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kanabhai vs State
Judges: Anant S Dave
22 March, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the applicant and it is submitted that 'wil' executed in 1958 as well as in 2006 referred to in complaint are subject matter of the civil suit pending in the Civil Court.In view of the above, Notice returnable on 9.4.2012.Meanwhile no coercive action be taken against the a...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Unknown
Judges:
22 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Office to verify and report as to whether original opponent no.2-Lalsing alias Badal Shivgopalsing Thakur has been released by the District Court or by the Sessions Court pursuant to the order dated 22.03.2012 passed by this Court or not. Report be called f...
High Court Of Gujarat
Deputy Engineer (O & M) ­ vs Mustaqahmed Fatemohmed Pirzada & ...
Judges:
22 March, 2012·DEPUTY ENGINEER (O & M) Applicant(s) Versus MUSTAQAHMED FATEMOHMED PIRZADA & 1 Respondent(s) ========================================= Appearance :MS LILU K BHAYA for Applicant(s) : 1, None for Respondent(s) : 1, MR JK SHAH ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) : 2, =========================...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mercury vs Natubhai
Judges:
22 March, 2012·Rule.Expedited.By way of ad-interim relief, the impugned award is stayed qua the direction regarding grant of 50% back-wages and continuity of service on condition that the order of reinstatement shall be implemented within a period of 30 days from today. In case of failure to reinstate the responde...
High Court Of Gujarat
Larsen vs The
Judges:
22 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) The applicant had complained of the respondents not obeying the order of satus-quo dated 11.11.2011 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner in Misc. Application No.25/2011. With such grievance the present contempt petition was filed.On 29.2.2012, we had is...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kashiben vs The
Judges:
22 March, 2012·The Office Note indicates that as per the order dated 22.03.2012, Mr.Gopinath M. Amin, learned counsel appearing for the applicant has supplied the fresh address of respondent No.1/4 vide Note dated 03.10.2012.Fresh Notice of Rule to respondent No.1/4 at the correct address, returnable on 17.12.2012...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.