Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Vanrajsinh Chandubha Gohil vs State Of Gujarat & 12

High Court Of Gujarat|22 March, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. The endorsement in the cause list reveals that respondent no.3 is unserved.
2. However, considering the cause title, respondent no.3 appears to be Police Inspector, "A" Division Police Station, Rajkot City, Rajkot.
3. Mr.K.P.Raval, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents-State waives service of Notice qua the respondent no.3.
4. Mr.Qureshi, learned advocate for the applicant seeks time to file rejoinder. S.O. to 29.03.2012.
(J.C.UPADHYAYA,J.) Girish HC-NIC Page 1 of 1 Created On Sat Dec 10 00:39:19 IST 2016
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vanrajsinh Chandubha Gohil vs State Of Gujarat & 12

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
22 March, 2012

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.