Appearance: vs Mr.M.A.Bukhari
Judges:
26 March, 2012·1.List has been revised thrice. None appeared for the petitioner. Papers have been examined and Shri M.A.Bukhari has been heard.2.Two reliefs have been claimed in this petition. First is that the petitioner be enlarged on Parole for a period of 30 days and the second is that the petitioner be releas...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chandrakant vs Manjulaben
Judges:
26 March, 2012·Rule.Mr.Shailesh Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent-wife waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-wife.By way of present revision application, filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1073, the applicant has prayed to quash and set asid...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs Mr Bharat Shah For
Judges:
26 March, 2012·At the request made by learned advocate Mr.Bharat Shah for the respondent, with the consent of learned advocate Mr.Sachin D. Vasasvada for the appellant, the matter is adjourned to 2nd April 2012.[ RAJESH H. SHUKLA, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Harkhabhai
Judges:
26 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Office objection(s) be removed on or before 9.4.2012 failing which the matter will automatically stand dismissed for non-prosecution.(Akil Kureshi,J.) (C.L.Soni,J.) an vyas Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pathan vs District
Judges:
26 March, 2012·Leave to add the District Collector, Gandhingar, as party respondent .Notice to the newly added party, returnable on 19th April, 2012. Direct service is permitted.(K.S.JHAVERI,J.) pawan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Mr Mb Gandhi For
Judges:
26 March, 2012·1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgement?2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Cons...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Coram : Mr.Justice J.M.Panchal
Judges:
26 March, 2012·(Per : Panchal, J.) By means of filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside order dated July 3, 2000 of Special Land Acquisition Officer and Deputy Collector,Narmadar Project Unit No.7, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Niren vs State
Judges:
26 March, 2012·1. This petition under Article-226 of the Constitution of India has been filed, with the following prayers :"A) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ or mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing respondents to consider objections of...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs
Judges:
26 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)1. On 12.03.2012, this Court directed Registry to make necessary arrangement getting an Advocate from Legal Aid Committee to assist the respondent. The matter was adjourned for today 26.03.2012.1.1 It is brought to the notice of the Court that on 12.03.20...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sadhuben Wd/O Kachrabhai Mali & 3S vs Manubhai Jamnadas Mehta & 5
Judges: M R Shah
26 March, 2012·1. The present Civil Revision Application u/s.115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the applicants herein – judgement debtor to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 07/09/1999 passed by learned Executing Court below Exh-1 in Execution Petition No.73 of 1997...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.