Baroda vs Baroda
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Learned advocate Shri Naik appearing for the Company submits that unfortunately the counsel of the Company is unable to attend the court for this matter and therefore, he seeks sometime. Learned advocate for the workman Shri Dave submitted that in case of genuine difficulties, there cannot be any ob...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vrundavan vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR) Learned counsel Mr. H.S. Munshaw states that he is appearing for the respondent-Corporation, to whom notice is issued in Civil Application. He requested for some time to take instructions. At his request, the matter is adjourned to 28th June, 2012.Registry ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Velabhhai vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·The instant application is forwarded by applicant - convict through jail seeking parole leave for 30 days on the ground of construction of his house. Considering the jail remarks sheet, it transpires that the conviction appeal preferred by the applicant - convict in this Court came to be dismissed o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shree vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Rule.Learned Advocate Mrs.Mumtaz Saiyed for the Applicant seeks permission to withdraw this Special Criminal Application at this stage with liberty to make an appropriate application before the authority or the appropriate Court.Permission as prayed for is granted. The present Application stands dis...
High Court Of Gujarat
Budhilal vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Since the cause of parole leave does not survive, the application is dismissed.(J.C.UPADHYAYA, J.) (binoy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Alahrakhabhai vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called out. The application is dismissed for default.[BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, ACTING CJ.] [J.B.PARDIWALA, J.] pirzada/-Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nasir vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Rule.MR.Vyas, learned Special Public Prosecutor waives service of Rule for the respondent-State.The instant application is filed seeking temporary bail for further period of 30 days in connection with FIR being I- C.R. No.252/2009 registered with Odhav Police Station, District:Ahmedabad regarding th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kirit vs Anilkumar
Judges:
14 June, 2012·1. RULE.Mr.Shalin Mehta, learned counsel waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, Ms.Sangita Vishen, learned A.G.P. waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent Nos.3 and 4 and Ms.Sejal K. Mandavia, learned counsel waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.5.2. Consideri...
High Court Of Gujarat
Noor vs Present
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Present Civil Revision Application under section 29(2) of the Bombay Rent Act has been preferred by the petitioner herein - original defendant to quash and set aside the impugned judgement and decree dtd.31/3/1990 passed by the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Rajpipla in Regular Civil Suit No.27 of 1986...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ketankumar vs Daulatram
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Neither in the first call nor in the second call, learned advocate for the petitioner is present. Mr. Joshi, learned advocate for the respondent, was present in the first call and is also present in the second call. Despite any request for adjournment in the first call on behalf of the petitioner, p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.