Navin vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Rule.Mr. Nanavati, Ld. APP appears and waives service of rule for the respondent - State.[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with C.R. No. III-287 of 2011 registered ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharatkumar vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Prima facie, the father of the petitioner was serving as Rojmadar Watchman with the office of the Deputy Executive Engineer, ( R & B), Sub-Division, Kheda and the petitioner is not entitled to be considered for compassionate appointment.Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed reliance on the dec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Babumiya vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Rule.Mr. JK Shah, Ld. APP appears and waives service of rule for the respondent - State.1. This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with First Information Report registered as C.R. No. I-130 of 2011 with Mahemdabad Police Station for the offences pu...
High Court Of Gujarat
Buddhisagar vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Notice to the respondents making it returnable on 28th June 2012.Direct Service is permitted.(K.S.Jhaveri, J.) *mohd Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shree vs Gujarat
Judges:
14 June, 2012·In reply to the query raised by the Court, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the entire period, i.e. from the date on which the petitioner purchased the land in question and made application/request for transferring its name, the petitioner has not received any reply of wh...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gambhirbhai vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail so as to enable him to have partition of the property. It is mentioned in the application that his father died on 19.01.2007. Learned APP to get the explanation of such a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ghanshyambhai vs Regional
Judges:
14 June, 2012·The petitioner appears to have filed affidavit of direct service. The cause list shows that the notice is served by direct service. Though served, no one has appeared for respondent.Rule returnable on 27th July 2012.(K.M.THAKER, J.) jani Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mamta vs At
Judges:
14 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR) At the request of learned advocate Mr.Kapadia appearing for respondent No.3, adjourned to 15.6.2012.(P.B.MAJMUDAR,J) (MOHINDER PAL,J) pathan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Karansinh
Judges:
14 June, 2012·1. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, arises out of judgment dated 31st December, 2011 passed in MACP No. 1273 of 2008 by Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (Auxiliary) Vadodara at Chotta Udaipur, in a case where the claimant claim compensation of Rs. 7,00,000/-.2. The short f...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.