Kandla vs Union
Judges:
14 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)1. Petitioners have filed this petition praying for a direction to prevent the respondents from enforcing compliance of the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 and from levying and demanding service tax in respect of activities undertaken by the members of p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Brady vs Asst
Judges:
14 June, 2012·On 10.05.2012, this Court (Coram: K.S. Jhaveri, J.) while issuing Rule, observed that the assessment was not made by then. After the same was done, the petitioner shall deposit the assessed amount with the Registry of this Court within a period of four weeks from the date of service of the order of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manubhai vs Learned
Judges:
14 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR) Notice, returnable on 21st June, 2012.Learned counsel Mr.Roshan Desai waives service of Notice for respondent No.6.It is agreed by both the parties that matter may be finally heard and disposed of on the returnable date.The matter be placed just below the a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ravi vs Bharat
Judges:
14 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after going through the averments made in the application, we find that for effective disposal of the main PIL, presence of the applicant is necessary. We accordingly allow this appl...
High Court Of Gujarat
Lachha vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Rule. Mr.Shah, learned APP appears and waives service of notice of rule for respondent - State.The instant application is forwarded through jail by applicant - convict seeking parole leave for 21 days. However, considering the jail remarks sheet, so also the submissions advanced by Mr.Shah, learned ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hasmukhbhai vs District
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Mr.C.P.Champaneri, learned advocate for the petitioner, submits that he has received instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.2 and prays for time, in order to file the Vakalatnama and the affidavit-in-reply.List on 27.06.2012.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) rakesh/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ali vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Mr.N.V.Gandhi, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to delete respondent No.1.Permission, as sought for, is granted. Respondent No.1 is hereby permitted to be deleted.Notice returnable on 20.06.2012. Direct service is permitted.(R.M.CHHAYA, J.) Hitesh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhudarji vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Rule returnable on 22/06/2012. Mr. Nanavati, Ld. APP appears and waives service of rule for the respondent - State.Mr. Virat Popat, Ld.Advocate appears and states that he has instructions to appears for the original complainant and he shall file his appearance in this matter. Permission, as prayed f...
High Court Of Gujarat
Commissioner vs In
Judges: Akil Kureshi Devani, Harsha Devani
14 June, 2012·(Per :HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)1. In this appeal under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the appellant - Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs has challenged the order dated 19th September, 2005 passed by the Customs, Excise and Serv...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.