Ashokjyot Oxygen Pvt Ltd vs H N Patel Income Tax Officer Ward 11
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
18 June, 2012·(Per: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI) 1. The petitioner, a private limited company, engaged in the business of Industrial Gases has challenged the notice dated 4.2.2003 issued by respondent under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) seeking to reopen th...
High Court Of Gujarat
I T O vs Lakhanpal National Ltd Opponents
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
18 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI) 1) By this appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) the appellant-revenue has challenged the order dated 26.10.1999 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in I.T.A. No.1406/Ahd/1991 for Assessment ye...
High Court Of Gujarat
Khengarbhai vs State
Judges:
18 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)1. The present application is filed by the convict through his wife seeking temporary bail for a period of 30 days so as to arrange for the admission of his son in 11th standard as his son has passed 10th standard examination with 97.92 percentile rank.2....
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmadhussain vs State
Judges:
18 June, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner has placed on record the office order dated 21st August, 2009, issued by the respondents, by which the petitioner has been appointed as permanent employee of the Municipality. The said office order is taken on record.In view of the above, the present petition does...
High Court Of Gujarat
Natvarbhai vs Commissioner
Judges:
18 June, 2012·The petitioner detenu filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging his detention pursuant to the detention order dated 11.01.2012, which was executed on 14.01.2012, passed by the respondent No. 1-The Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, by exercising the pow...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs Lavar
Judges:
18 June, 2012·Order in Civil Application Nos.3351/2012, 3352/2012, 3354/2012 and 3356/2012.[1] This Civil Application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone delay of occurred in filing First Appeal.[2] Rule is served to the respondent. However, nobody appears for the respondent.[3] Taking into ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sarojkumar vs State
Judges:
18 June, 2012·1. Rule.Mr.K.L.Pandya, learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent-state.2. The instant application is filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail in connection with Mundra Police Station CR No. 1 of 2012 (NDPS) under sections 8(C), 20(b) & 29 of NDP...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jasminbhai vs State
Judges:
18 June, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Chinmay Gandhi for Mr. M.B.Gandhi, learned Advocate for the petitioner.2. What is challenged in the present petition is rejection of application filed under section 65 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code for Non agriculture permission by the concerned authority i.e. District Collector, Ahme...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mathurbhai vs State
Judges:
18 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) It is submitted by learned Special Public Prosecutor that appeal is not yet admitted and the admission hearing is in coming week.The matter is adjourned to 05.07.2012.(RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Sunil W. Wagh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Anand vs National
Judges:
18 June, 2012·Even in the fourth round, learned advocate Mr. P.S. Champaneri, is not present. In the interest of justice, as a last chance, S.O. to 19th June, 2012.It is made clear that if Mr. Champaneri is not in a position to attend the Court, he will make alternative arrangement by the next date of hearing.Off...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.