Palakben vs State
Judges:
18 June, 2012·The present application has been filed by the applicant under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as well as under Section 482 and 93 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging the impugned order passed by the 6th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad (Rural) in Criminal Misc....
High Court Of Gujarat
Baader vs Parsoli
Judges:
18 June, 2012·1. The petitioner has taken out present petition under Section 433 (e) and(f), Section 434 and Section 439 (1)(b) of Companies Act,1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The petitioner has alleged, inter alia, that the respondent Company has despite repeated reminders and even after statutory ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tobanbhai vs Executive
Judges:
18 June, 2012·1. The petition is taken out by the petitioner, seeking below mentioned reliefs and directions:"29(B) That the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow this Special Civil Application by issuing appropriate writ, order or direction by directing respondent to forthwith reconnect the connection of the pet...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bahadursinh vs Collector
Judges:
18 June, 2012·The learned advocate for the petitioner prays for permission to implead the State of Gujarat through the concerned Secretary, as party respondent No.1. Permission to do so, is granted. The necessary amendment be carried out, forthwith.Heard Mr.Asifkhan I. Pathan, learned advocate for the petitioner....
High Court Of Gujarat
Yogesh vs Principal
Judges:
18 June, 2012·Heard Mr. Paul, learned Advocate for the petitioner.In view of the order passed by the Court on 7th May 2012, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested for permission to withdraw the petition with a view to approaching appropriate authority/forum.The request as prayed for is granted. The peti...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ibrahim vs New
Judges:
18 June, 2012·Learned advocate Mr.Majmudar for respondents submits that the concerned respondents will maintain status-quo till the arbitration proceedings are disposed of by the Arbitrator.In view of this statement, this appeal and civil application are disposed of accordingly.( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayes vs State
Judges:
18 June, 2012·Rule.Expedited.[K.S.JHAVERI,J.] pawan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Savaji vs State
Judges:
18 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)1. Learned APP places on record the statement of the convict recorded on dated Nil, stating therein that earlier he was doing agricultural operation on crop share basis.2. The present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arvindgigir vs It
Judges:
18 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) As such the award is dated 20th February, 2006 and will not be enforceable after expiry period of 30 days i.e. from 20th March, 2006. Reinstatement as per the order dated 19th March, 2012 is made as daily wagers but it appears that wages from 22th March, 20...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahesh vs State
Judges:
18 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail for a period of 30 days so as to arrange for 'Jiyanu' of his niece (sister's daughter).Rule.Learned APP Mr.Pujari waives service of rule on behalf of respondent-State.Lea...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.