Rushabh vs Official
Judges:
29 June, 2012·1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Pavan S. Godiawala for the Applicant and Official Liquidator of Hilton Organic Chemicals Private Limited (In Liquidation).2. The present three applications are filed for recalling, reviewing of the three different orders dated 24.3.2011 passed in Company Petitions Nos. ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Washing vs Gujarat
Judges:
29 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Ms Raval appearing for GPCB has instructions to appear. She waives service of notice for GPCB. Let the matter appear on July 6, 2012.(Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Actg. C.J.) (J.B.Pardiwala, J.) */Mohandas Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abhaysinh vs Central
Judges:
29 June, 2012·The learned advocate for the applicant has moved a draft amendment. The same is granted and may be carried out on, or before, the next date of hearing.Heard Mr.S.V.Raju, learned Senior Advocate with Mr.P.R.Abichandani,learned advocate and Mr.Rohit Verma, learned advocate on behalf of the applicant.L...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ankur vs State
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Rule.Mr. Kodekar, Ld. APP appears and waives service of rule for respondent State.1. The instant application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail in connection with C.R. No. I-61/2012 registered with Maninagar Police Station, for the offences punishable u...
High Court Of Gujarat
Indravadan vs Jitendrabhai
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Present application has been preferred by the applicants herein under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay in preferring the Second Appeal.Having heard the learned advocates appearing for respective parties at length and as the application is not seriously opposed by learned advocate...
High Court Of Gujarat
Naresh vs State
Judges:
29 June, 2012·This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 20.01.2012 passed by respondent No. 2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short 'the Act') by detaining the detenue as a "bootlegger" as defined under Sect...
High Court Of Gujarat
N.V.Parmar vs Suleman
Judges:
29 June, 2012·1. This appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short "the Act") challenges the judgment and award dated 29.11.2000 passed by the learned M.A.C. Tribunal (Main), Bhavnagar in M.A.C.P. No.941 of 1998.2. Short facts for which the claim petition was filed are as under:-According t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Deputy vs Somabhai
Judges:
29 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Rule returnable on 24th July, 2012.(JAYANT PATEL,J.) (C.L.SONI,J.) Vahid Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sayarabibi vs It
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Having heard learned counsel for both the sides, the application is allowed in terms of Para-6(A). Registry is directed to issue Demand Draft in the name of the applicant herein for the amount stated in the prayer-clause.It is, however, clarified that the above payment is made towards full and final...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.