Usmanbhai vs Manager
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Learned advocate for petitioner as well as respondent are positively expecting settlement to be made between the parties, which may put amicably between the parties and make a requests for adjournment upto 25.06.2012. S.O to 25.06.2012.(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) pallav Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shafdar vs State
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Rule returnable on 27.6.2012.(BANKIM N. MEHTA, J) (pkn) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhanji vs State
Judges:
20 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)1. The present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail for a period of 30 days so as to undertake agricultural operations. In support of the application, a certificate from the Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Sinjiwada, Taluka : ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sri vs M
Judges:
20 June, 2012·M/s.Bhuval Industries, who is the Ship Breaker, has filed an application for intervention. Mr.Mihir H.Joshi, learned Senior Advocate with Mr.Amitav Majoomdar, learned advocate for M/s.Bhuval Industries, states that as per the Survey Report, the approximate quantities of the Bunkers in the Vessel "AC...
High Court Of Gujarat
Babiben vs Feril
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the applicants.Prima facie it appears that the delay caused in filing the appeal under Workmen's Compensation Act cannot be attributed to negligence or carelessness on the part of the applicant inasmuch as the concerned advocate who was assigned the above task had failed t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Aiyubsha vs State
Judges:
20 June, 2012·1. The instant application is filed under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking anticipatory bail in connection with DCB Police station, Ahmedabad, Prohibition CR No. - 5064/2011 regarding offences punishable under sections 8(c), 20(b) and 29 of the NDPS Act.2. Mr.R. M. Agrawal, learned ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Build vs Gujarat
Judges:
20 June, 2012·Even in second call, learned Advocate for petitioner has not remained present. Neither in first call nor in second call any request for passover or adjournment is made. None has appeared for the petitioner. Mr. Meena, learned Advocate for respondent No.1 has submitted that the petition has become in...
High Court Of Gujarat
Naliniben vs Kantaben
Judges:
20 June, 2012·As the dispute seems to be between the Mother-in-law and Daughter-in-law (who is widow), it appears that this is a matter where parties should explore the possibility of settlement. Hence, S.O. to 5/7/2012.In the meantime, the respective parties and/or at least mother, in whose favour the property i...
High Court Of Gujarat
Meenakshi vs Registrar
Judges:
20 June, 2012·At the request of Mr. Bhaskar Tanna, Senior Counsel for Mr. Mehta for the petitioner, matter is adjourned to 17.07.2012.Mr.Nanavati, learned advocate for the respondent no. 1 is not present even today. Even on the last occasion he was not present on account of sick note. No alternative arrangement h...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.