Christ vs University
Judges:
21 June, 2012·1. By way of this petition the petitioner is challenging the letter dated 10.01.2012, whereby, the petitioner college was informed to refund an amount of Rs.23,90,000/- on the ground that the petitioner college was found to be a self-finance institution.2. The brief facts leading to filing of the pr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Banaskantha vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·On behalf of learned advocate Mr.Shah for the petitioners, adjournment is requested for on the ground that the petitioners want to file rejoinder reply. Request for adjournment is also made by learned advocate for the applicant in Civil Application No.6639 of 2012. Learned advocate for the responden...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharatbhai vs Labhuben
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Mr.Chirag Patel, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant-original petitioner states that he has no instructions in the matter. Hence, notice to petitioner returnable on 16.7.2012.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs :
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Mr.Abhay Shah, learned advocate states that he has instruction to appear for the respondent No.2 and seeks time to file reply. Hence, S.O to 10th July, 2012.[ Z. K. SAIYED, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Arvindbhai
Judges:
21 June, 2012·1 The Insurance Company has filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, [for short, 'the Act'] challenging the judgment and award dated 30th July 2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux), Gandhidham, at Kutch, in M.A.C. Petition No.211 of 2000, whereby, the Tr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kalpanaben vs Anantkumar
Judges:
21 June, 2012·[1] When the matter is called out, learned advocate for the applicant is not present. Though notice of rule is served to the respondents, nobody appears.[2] This Civil Application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone delay of 32 days occurred in filing Appeal from Order.[3] Taki...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arjanbhai vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) Rule returnable on 27.6.2012.[RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J.] [PARESH UPADHYAY, J.] mandora/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Saurashtra vs Labdhi
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Rule returnable on 26.7.2012. Learned advocate for the appellant - original defendant no. 1 stated that the appellant is ready and willing to deposit 50% amount i.e. Rs.7,50,000/- with proportionate cost with the Trial Court within one month from today. In view of the above, relief in terms of para ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Muslim vs State
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner has requested for permission to withdraw present petition with a view to taking out appropriate proceedings before the Tribunal under the provisions of the Wakf Act.The permission as requested for is granted. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.(K.M.Thaker, J...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs Its
Judges:
21 June, 2012·Heard learned counsel for petitioner. Though served, none is present for the respondent. The petitioner, first party-the employer in Reference (IT) No.351 of 1991 in the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad has approached this Court, under article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.