1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Kalpanaben vs Anantkumar

High Court Of Gujarat|21 June, 2012
[1] When the matter is called out, learned advocate for the applicant is not present. Though notice of rule is served to the respondents, nobody appears.
[2] This Civil Application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone delay of 32 days occurred in filing Appeal from Order.
[3] Taking into consideration averments made in the application and same has not been controverted by the other side by filing an affidavit or reply, I am of the view that sufficient cause has been stated for not filing the appeal from order in time and hence, delay caused in filing the appeal from order is to be condoned and application is required to be allowed.
[4] For the reasons stated above, application is allowed. Delay caused in filing appeal from order is condoned. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
[M.D.Shah, J.] satish Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Kalpanaben vs Anantkumar


High Court Of Gujarat

21 June, 2012