Prakash vs Kanaiyalal
Judges:
26 June, 2012·Admit.Mr.Amrish Pandya, learned advocate waives notice of admission on behalf of the respondent.[M.D.Shah, J.] satish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
M/S vs Upon
Judges:
26 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Upon hearing Mr.Panesar for the applicant and Mr.Bharat Jani for the opponent, it appears that pursuant to the earlier order passed by this Court dated 13.06.2012, the amount of Rs.1,98,82,237/- has already been deposited by the respondent Bank.It was submi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mr vs 6 Upon
Judges:
26 June, 2012·1 This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, arises out of the judgment and award dated 13.7.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Fast Track Court No.11, Vadodara, in M.A.C. Petition No.1788 of 1996.2 The short facts on the basis of which the claim petition a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ganpatiben vs State
Judges:
26 June, 2012·Notice returnable on 4.7.2012.Direct Service is permitted.(K.M.Thaker, J.) Bharat* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Haribhai vs State
Judges:
26 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail for a period of 60 days so as to construct his house.In support of the application, the photograph of the half constructed house is enclosed. Besides that, the Certificat...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Unknown
Judges:
26 June, 2012·1. RULE.Mr. Nikhil S. Kariel, learned advocate for the opponent waives service of Rule on behalf of the opponent.2. Considering the issue involved in this application and with consent of learned advocates appearing for the parties, this application is taken up for final disposal forthwith.3. Conside...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Unknown
Judges:
26 June, 2012·1. RULE.Mr. Nikhil S. Kariel, learned advocate for the opponent waives service of Rule on behalf of the opponent.2. Considering the issue involved in this application and with consent of learned advocates appearing for the parties, this application is taken up for final disposal forthwith.3. Conside...
High Court Of Gujarat
Motilal vs State
Judges:
26 June, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Joshi, learned advocate for the petitioner.2. The petitioner has taken out present petition seeking below mentioned relief/s:-"20 (A) The Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the order dated 16.4.2012 passed by responde...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ravinaben vs Director
Judges:
26 June, 2012·(1) The present petition is restricted to prayer clause 21(B). The Director, Primary Education, Gandhinagar, is directed to decide the appeal within a period of two months from the receipt of this order. No other prayer is granted.(2) With the aforesaid directions, the present petition stands dispos...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jatin vs Union
Judges:
26 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA) Heard learned advocate for the applicant. Mr. Y.N. Ravani appears for the respondent.2. The present application is filed for condonation of delay of 32 days in filing the restoration application. That restoration application was filed to set aside the order...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.