Commissioner vs M. Sahai
Judges:
04 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) We have heard Mrs. Mauna M. Bhatt, learned Standing Counsel for the revenue.ADMIT.In the present Tax Appeal, the Revenue has proposed three questions. However, question No. [A] and [B] have already been rejected by this Court in Tax Appeal No.2144 of 2009 an...
High Court Of Gujarat
Land vs Kantibhai
Judges:
04 July, 2012·[1] It is submitted by Mr.Yatin Soni, learned advocate that he is appearing for the respondent in all the Civil Applications.[2] Civil Applications are filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone delay occurred in filing First Appeals.[3] Taking into consideration averments made in the ap...
High Court Of Gujarat
Purnima vs Unitop
Judges:
04 July, 2012·Shri Nirav A. Joshi, learned advocate for Nanavati Associates, has submitted that, note dated 20th June, 2012 was required to be filed as the respondent did not respond to umpteen number of requests for furnishing instructions in this matter. Hence, the advocate had no choice, but to retire from the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kanchanben vs Medhasan
Judges:
04 July, 2012·Though the matter is called out twice, nobody is present on behalf of M/S Patel advocates for respondent no. 1. The matter could have been ex-parte proceeded, however, in the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned .It is made clear that the on the next occasion, if, the learned advocate does n...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Hafeez
Judges:
04 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR)1. All these appeals are directed against the common order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Special Civil Application No. 5728/2010 to 5732/2010, by which, the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petitions filed by the petitioners-studen...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kaushikbhai vs State
Judges:
04 July, 2012·Mr.Majmudar, learned advocate for the applicant, upon instruction, seeks permission to withdraw the present application.Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The instant application stands disposed of, as withdrawn. Rule is discharged.(J.C.UPADHYAYA,J.) Girish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Iliyas vs State
Judges:
04 July, 2012·1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to upgrade the post of the petitioner from Peon cum driver to driver with effect from 01.01.2005 as per Government Resolution dated 21.08.1990 issued b...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Public Prosecutor For
Judges:
04 July, 2012·Board shows that rule is unserved to respondent No.2.Fresh notice of rule to respondent No.2 returnable on 31st July 2012. Direct service is permitted.[ Z. K. SAIYED, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
3 vs Notice Served For Respondent(S) : ...
Judges:
04 July, 2012·Rule.Learned APP Ms. Archana Raval waives service of Rule for Respondent No.1-State of Gujarat and learned Advocate Mr. P.P.Majmudar waives service of Rule for Respondent No.2-Original Complainant.The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioners under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs Nalin
Judges:
04 July, 2012·Though Rule has been issued in the petition, it has been listed in the admission Board, probably because notice as to interim-relief has been issued.Mr.H.S.Munshaw, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr.Yogen N. Pandya, learned advocate for respondent No.1, jointly submit that as the matter per...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.