(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) We have heard Mrs. Mauna M. Bhatt, learned Standing Counsel for the revenue.
ADMIT.
In the present Tax Appeal, the Revenue has proposed three questions. However, question No. [A] and [B] have already been rejected by this Court in Tax Appeal No.2144 of 2009 and 1301 of 2009 respectively. Hence, we formulate the following substantial question of law in this appeal :-
"Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of Rs.64,077/- being subsidized gas connection to the Company employees ?"
Issue notice to the other side. Paper book be filed within 3 months.
Connect with Tax Appeal No.60 of 2009, 888 of 2010 and other cognate matters.
Sd/-
[V.
M. SAHAI, J.] Sd/-
[N.
V. ANJARIA, J.] Savariya Top