Vejuben vs State
Judges:
10 July, 2012·1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-"a) This Hon'ble Court will be pleased to admit and allow this petition;b). This Hon'ble Court will be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, orde...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jagdishbhai vs None For
Judges:
10 July, 2012·Heard Ms.Jirga Jhaveri, learned APP for the appellant - State.Appeal is ADMITTED.Bailable warrant be issued against the respondent in the sum of Rs.5,000/-.[ Z. K. SAIYED, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sultan vs Avesh
Judges:
10 July, 2012·Learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition at this stage, with a view to raise objections against the report of the Commissioner impugned in this petition, in accordance with law.Permission as prayed for is granted.In view of the above, this petition is disposed of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Faizalkhan vs State
Judges:
10 July, 2012·Rule returnable on 20th July, 2012. Mr. M.G.Nanavati, learned APP appears and waives service of rule for the respondent-State.(Ms.Sonia Gokani,J) bina Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narendrabhai vs State
Judges:
10 July, 2012·Learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application since charge sheet is not filed.Permission is granted as prayed for. Matter stands disposed of as withdrawn.Rule is discharged.(MS SONIA GOKANI, J.) chandrashekhar* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vasantbhai vs Joint
Judges:
10 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR) None present for the appellants when the matters are called out. Mr.Kanabar is present for respondent No.2.2.2. The appeals are arising out of the orders passed by the Charity Commissioner under section 41-A of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. The said o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kishore vs State
Judges:
10 July, 2012·Learned APP seeks time. At her request, matter is kept on 17.07.2012.(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) Pankaj Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nitinbhai vs State
Judges:
10 July, 2012·Mr.K.S.Chandrani appears for the applicant. Mr.M.G.Nanavati, ld.APP appears for the respondent -State. Ld.advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application, to which either side has no objection. Permission as sought for is granted. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hamid vs State
Judges:
10 July, 2012·In the second session, as the learned advocates are not present, at the interest of justice, present matter is kept on 16.07.2012, with clear understanding that if the learned advocates will not present on the next date i.e. 16.07.2012, appropriate orders would be passed and the interim relief, if a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mustak vs Union
Judges:
10 July, 2012·Though served, the respondent has not appeared either in person or through advocate.Considering the averments made in the application, this application is allowed. Delay caused in filing first appeal is condoned. Rule is made absolute.( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.