The State Of Gujarat vs Sunderji Musaji Thakerda
Judges:
16 July, 2012·This Court ( Coram:K.J.Vaidya & D.G.Karia,JJ) by an order dated 10-9-96 issued notice and made it returnable on 25-9-96. Today, the endorsement in the board shows that the notice has not returned either served or unserved. Under the circumstances the office is directed to immediately call for the ex...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sadik vs The
Judges:
16 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR) Rule.Learned counsel Mr. Jayant Panchal, who is specially appointed as Special Public Prosecutor in this matter, waives service of Rule.By filing this application, the applicant has prayed that since he wants to go for pilgrimage to Makka Madina for Hajj, h...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Oral Order :
Judges:
15 July, 2012·:After hearing both the Revisions Applications, learned advocate Shri J.N. Jadeja appearing for the petitioners in both the Revision Applications submitted that permission may be granted to withdraw both the Revision Applications and two year time may be granted to the petitioners to vacate both the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Bb Naik For
Judges:
15 July, 2012·"Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that construction in the proposed parking area has been demlished on 14.6.95 and it is further stated that they have no intention to put any construction thereon. Mr Nayak submits that so far as the question of providing facility of lift is concerned, they...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oral Order vs Unknown
Judges:
15 July, 2012·Heard heard the learned Counsel and perused the petition. No foundation has been raised factually of any overt action taken by the respondent contrary to law for dispossessing the petitioners from the premises in question of which they allege to be in lawful possession. It cannot be assumed on mere ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Learned Advocate For The vs Unknown
Judges:
15 July, 2012·Learned Advocate for the petitioner is unable to state whether or not the aforesaid order with respect to grant of ad-interim relief is complied with. If the amount of Rs. 3000/- is deposited by or on behalf of the petitioner within the stipulated time-limit, the ad-interim relief will be confirmed....
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Manish R Bhatt For
Judges:
14 July, 2012·Tribunal has referred the following question under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to this Court for opinion : - "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in rejecting the claim for weighted deduction under Section 35B of the Act on the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Mr Nr Divetia For
Judges:
14 July, 2012·"Tribunal has referred the following question under Section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to this Court opinion :- "Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and no facts in directing the I.T.O. to grant registration to the assessee firm when one of the new partners inducted and become p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Nk Majmudar For
Judges:
14 July, 2012·Admit.Mr.N.K.Majmudar, learned Advocate waives service on behalf of respondents Nos.l and 2. Respondent No.3, who is present in the Court, waives service on behalf of himself and also on behalf of respondent No.4 since , according to him, he is the power of attorney of respondent No.4.It is made cle...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Unknown
Judges:
14 July, 2012·The Tribunal has referred the following question for the opinion of this Court under Section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 : "Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that if the unpaid sales tax liability pertaining to the last quarter is paid within the time sti...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.