Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Mr Rn Chhaya For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners are the owners of land comprising in Survey Nos.767, 768 and 774. The final development plan for the town of Dhoraji was sanctioned vide Government Notification, Panchayat and Health Department, dated 11th July 1975, under the provisions of the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs Suleman
Judges:
16 July, 2012·1. This is an application for condoning the delay caused in filing the First Appeal. However, the appeal under challenge is involving an amount less than Rs. 1.00 lakhs (Rupees One Lakh only), and hence, as per the consistent practice of this Court, this Court is not inclined to entertain the appeal...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Jd Ajmera For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·The applicant has prayed for extension of the time to pay Rs. 2 lakh, which were required to be deposited by the petitioner on or before 24.9.1996, upto 2.10.1996. The petitioner has deposited Rs. 1 lakh as stated in application and therefore there seems to be no objection if time is extended upto 1...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amrutlal vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·1. This Miscellaneous Criminal Application has been preferred under Section-439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code being aggrieved by grant of regular bail by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Mehsana Camp-Visnagar in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.1027 of 2011 on 3rd January, 2011.2. The ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Executive vs Paras
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Heard Ms. Bhaya, learned advocate for the petitioner, and Mr. Kavina, learned Senior Counsel, with Mr. Shah, learned advocate for the respondent.2. On previous occasion, learned counsel for the respondent contended that in view of pendency of the proceedings before the Hon'ble Apex Court, present pr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harjiram vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Rule.Learned AGP, Ms.Shrutp Pathak, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent no.3. The Registry is directed to list this matter for final hearing in seriatim considering the actual date of detention. Direct service qua respondents No.1 and 2 is permitted.(S.R. Brahmbhatt, J.) Rathod ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narsing vs Firozsha
Judges: R M Chhaya
16 July, 2012·This Court had issued fresh notice to unserved respondent no.1 vide order dated 26.6.2012. However, the notice has not yet been served. Fresh notice to unserved respondent no.1 returnable on 7.8.2012. Direct service permitted. In addition to direct service, the petitioner shall cause service of noti...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Mr Jn Patel For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·In this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Labour Court on 25.6.84, in Recovery Application No.1203/81, whereby the petitioner company has been directed to pay an amount of Rs.1578/- with cost of Rs.50/- under the provisions...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Unknown
Judges:
16 July, 2012·The question of law with regard to jurisdiction of Civil Court in respect of deciding disputes between the Manager of College and College employee, which is connected with the conditions of service of such college employee, is involved in common in all these three matters. These matters are therefor...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Unknown
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Leave to amend. The petitioner - original claimant in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 928 of l993, pending before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Junagadh, has filed this application for transferring the said petition to the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad City. Rule has been issue...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.