Calama vs Jagdishsinh
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Both the counsel for the respective parties have stated at the bar that the dispute is amicably settled and as per the settlement the workman would b entitled to receive in total Rs.2,50000/- towards all claims as full and final settlement arising out of the litigation.The employer has already depos...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Public Prosecutor For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·In view of an affidavit filed by learned APP Mr Nigam Shukla, learned advocate Mr Kakkad wanted some time to enable him to get instructions. S.O. to 23rd October, 1996.It would be open to the petitioners to take possession of the house in question as according to statement made by learned APP Mr Shu...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Mr Unmesh D Shukla For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Heard Mr A H Mehta, learned Advocate for the petitioner, Mr Umesh D Shukla, learned Advocate for the non-applicant and Ms. Harsha Devani, learned AGP. 2.The issue which is required to be decided in this Criminal Misc. Application is whether the petitioner-wife can be charged for offence of kidnappin...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vipulsinh vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Applicant-Vipulsinh Kalusinh Darbar has preferred this application under Section 439 CrPC for grant of regular bail in connection with complaint being I-C.R No. 370 of 2011 registered with Sector-7 Police Station, Gandhinagar [Gujarat] for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 392, 201 & 120-B...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Shri A.G. Uraizee
Judges:
16 July, 2012·The order passed by and on behalf of the State Government (respondent No. 1 herein) on 8th February 1993 under sec. 34 of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (the Act for brief) is under challenge in this petition under art. 226 of the Constitution of India. By its impugned order, responde...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs This Petition Under Article 227 Of ...
Judges:
16 July, 2012·This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the Judgment and order of the Board of Nominee bringing the petitioners as heirs of deceased defendant No.6 on the record of Lavadi Suit No.1226 of 1992, confirmed by the Gujarat State Co-Operative Tribunal in Revision ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Surendrasinh vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·By way of present Revision Application, the applicant - original accused has challenged the judgment and order dated 29/7/2009 passed by learned 5th Additional Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nadiad in Criminal Case no. 8257/2006, by which, the applicant was convicted and sentenc...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Kc Shah
Judges:
16 July, 2012·1.In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs :-"(A) this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent District Registr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs Rajput
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Rule returnable on 13/08/2012.(M.D. SHAH, J.) (ila) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Anjanaben vs Gujarat
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Rule expedited.Appointment will be made subject to the outcome of this petition.It will be open for the petitioners to approach this petition by way of an appropriate application, if any exigency arises.[K.S.JHAVERI,J] Siddharth// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.