Appearance: vs Mr Nk Majmudar For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·The respondent workman was engaged by the petitioner college as daily wager casual labourer and he was offered some work for some days in some years.It is the case of the petitioner that no work was offered to him subsequently. The petitioner's further contention was that the respondent was paid wag...
High Court Of Gujarat
Legal vs Minaben
Judges:
16 July, 2012·1. RULE.Shri Siddharth Dave, learned advocate appearing for Shri Ajay Mehta, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondents nos. 4/2 to 4/4, who are also the heirs of original respondent no. 4/1-Ramanlal Maganlal Desai (now deceased).2. In the facts and circumstances of t...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Mr Niraj Ashar
Judges:
16 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Learned counsel, Mr.U.T.Mishra, appearing for the appellant fairly conceded that, the election in question being over, the appeal has become infructuous and it has to be disposed accordingly without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties and ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nilesh vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Rule.Learned AGP, Ms.Maithili Mehta, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent no.3. The Registry is directed to list this matter for final hearing in seriatim considering the actual date of detention. Direct service qua respondents No.1 and 2 is permitted.(S.R. Brahmbhatt, J.) Rathod...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kamleshbhai vs State
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Learned advocate Shri H.M Parikh appearing for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw this Application with a request to expedite the trial.Leave to withdraw this Criminal Misc. Application is granted. Criminal Misc. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Trial expedited. Rule is discharged wit...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Civil Application No. ... vs Mr Rj Oza For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Mr. P.J. Patel appears for the petitioners and states that five of the petitioners have instructed Mr. Patel that they do not intend to press this petition further. The communications received from the said writ petitioners by Mr. Patel are placed on the record of this matter. In view of the said in...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Both These Petitions Are Under ...
Judges:
16 July, 2012·Both these petitions arise between same parties and raise practically identical questions. Therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order.Both these petitions are under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned orders of the Labour Court. The respondents filed...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr Sn Soparkar For
Judges:
16 July, 2012·An inquiry report by respondent No.6 has been submitted by respondent No.6 on September 11,1996, pursuant to the order of this Court dated March 26,1996.Mr.Kirit Raval, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent No.6 states that Securities and Exchange Board of India is likely to initiate some act...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs Shantiben
Judges:
16 July, 2012·1. This is an application for condoning the delay caused in filing the First Appeal. However, the appeal under challenge is involving an amount less than Rs. 1.00 lakhs (Rupees One Lakh only), and hence, as per the consistent practice of this Court, this Court is not inclined to entertain the appeal...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kishorebhai vs Maheshji
Judges:
16 July, 2012·1. Heard Mr. R.S. Sanjanwala, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Apurva Kapadia for the petitioner, Mr. Padmraj K. Jadeja, learned advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4, Ms. Asmita Patel, learned AGP for respondent Nos.5, 6, 15 and 16 and Mr. Y.H. Motiramani, learned advocate for respondent Nos.7, 8/1 to...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.