Bhavin vs Ramdas
Judges:
17 July, 2012·Mr.Prabhakar Upadhyay, learned advocate for the petitioner has filed a sick-note, today.The endorsement on the Board indicates that notice issued to respondent No.2 has not been received back, either served or unserved. The Registry to await service of notice upon the said respondent.List on 01.08.2...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pacific vs All
Judges:
17 July, 2012·In view of the fact that approval is granted by respondent No.2- AICTE, Mr. Shelat for Ms. Desai, learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw present petition. Permission as prayed for is granted. Petition stands disposed as withdrawn. Notice is discharged with no order as to co...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nitaben vs Collector
Judges:
17 July, 2012·NOTICE to the newly added respondent Nos.6 to 8 returnable on 6.8.2012. Mr. Nehal R. Joshi, learned advocate waives service of notice on behalf of newly added respondent Nos.6 and 7 and Ms. Nisha Thakore, learned AGP waives service of notice on behalf of newly added respondent No.8.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kankaria vs Gujarat
Judges:
17 July, 2012·In view of the averments made in the applications, the same are granted in terms of para 4(A). The application stands disposed of accordingly. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.(K.S.JHAVERI,J.) pawan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharat vs Arvind
Judges:
17 July, 2012·Shri K.G. Pillai, learned advocate for Shri Mukul Sinha, learned advocate for petitioner requests for time. Accordingly, matter is adjourned to 25.07.2012.(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) pallav Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harjindarsingh vs State
Judges:
17 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict through his mother praying for temporary bail for a period of 45 days so as to make available required medical treatment to the convict's wife.Learned APP Mr.Pujari points out that the Criminal Appeal is ye...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vidyadhan vs National
Judges:
17 July, 2012·Learned counsel for the petitioner filed speaking to minutes and submits that due to typographical error, in order dated 03.07.2012 passed by this court "The interim order staying the impugned communication of Respondent no. 1 NCTE and Direct service is permitted"has not been mentioned.The request o...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Maltiben
Judges:
17 July, 2012·Rule.Expedited.In view of the order dated 22.04.2009 passed in Special Civil Application 3050/2009, the respondents are required to deposit the amount before this court which will be kept in the form of FDR and interest accrued on the amount will not be paid to anyone.The party who so ever will succ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vitthaldas vs Joint
Judges:
17 July, 2012·The petitioners have taken out present petition seeking below mentioned relief:-"(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions quashing and setting aside the order dated 10.5.2012 passed by respond...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.