Radhaben vs Torrent
Judges:
10 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. We have heard Mr.Chetan K.Pandya, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, Mr.K.B.Pujara, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 and Ms.Jirga Zaveri, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondent no.2.2. Learned counsel for the p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shantilal vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
10 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mr. Nirzar S. Desai for the applicant and learned APP Mr. H.L. Jani for respondent No.2-State.NOTICE to the respondents returnable on 2.12.2011. Learned APP Mr. H.L. Jani waives service of notice for respondent No.2-State. Ad-interim relief in terms of 11(C) till then. Direct ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ashwa vs State
Judges:
10 January, 2012·It appears that respondent No.2 is served and Notice has been accepted by one Kalpesh Patel for and on behalf of respondent No.2 herein. However, nothing has been mentioned that the said Kalpesh Patel has accepted the Notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Hence, Registry is directed to issue fresh No...
High Court Of Gujarat
Anwarbhai vs State
Judges:
10 January, 2012·The present application has been filed by the applicant-accused for grant of regular bail under sec. 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.The applicant-accused is charged with having committed offences under sections 302, 207 of IPC for which FIR, being C.R. No. I-10/2010, has been registered with ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abdulrasid vs State
Judges:
10 January, 2012·1. Ms.C. M. Shah, learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent.2. This application has been preferred under Section-439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in connection with the offence being CR No.I-271 of 2011 registered with Sardarnagar Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences u/s...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dolatsinh vs Bhikabhai
Judges:
10 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the parties. It appears that application Exh. 47 for bringing heirs of deceased defendant No. 1 on record was decided on the ground that copy of the application was not supplied. Hence the matter requires consideration. Hence Rule.Learned advocate Mr. Shah for respondent N...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jetunbibi vs Sarat
Judges:
10 January, 2012·This matter has been called out twice. Learned advocate Ms.Rukhsana M.Pathan is not present even on the second call.Heard learned advocate Mr.Harnish V.Darji appearing for respondent no.1.In this petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner - original plaintiff s...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ankurbhai vs State
Judges:
10 January, 2012·1 This application is filed by one of the Directors of Sigma Fores Services Private Limited, original accused No.1, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [for short, 'the Code'] with a prayer to quash FIR being I-C.R. No.34 of 2011 filed by respondent No.2 with D.C.B. Police Stat...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether vs State
Judges:
10 January, 2012·[1.0] Present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred by the applicant - original accused to quash and set aside the impugned complaint being Criminal Case No.182/2009 lodged by respondent No.2 herein, pending in the Court of learned Metropolitan Magi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.