M.D vs Mr Shirish M Trivedi For
Judges:
16 January, 2012·None present for the petitioner. Learned counsel, Mr.Shirish Trivedi submitted that the petitioner has passed away since long and a copy of his death certificate is submitted and placed on record to show that the petitioner has passed away on 18.9.2006. Even thereafter no application is made to brin...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajendra vs Regional
Judges:
16 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) To enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to file a translated copy of the order impugned, let the matter appear on January 25, 2012. Interim relief granted earlier be extended till January 25, 2012.(BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, ACT...
High Court Of Gujarat
Devikaben vs Dipakbhai
Judges:
16 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Place on 7.2.2012 alongwith Civil Application No.13471 of 2011 which is for amendment in the memo of appeal.(V.M.SAHAI,J) (A.J.DESAI,J) ***vcdarji Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Guddu vs State
Judges:
16 January, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-93 of 2011 registered with Ankleshwar GIDC Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 114 of t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tulsibhai vs Legal
Judges:
16 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) We have heard Mr. Subhash G. Barot, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Tulshi R. Savani for the appellants. He states that the appellants want to withdraw this appeal. The prayer is accepted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.In view of dismissal of app...
High Court Of Gujarat
Royal vs Sanjaykumar
Judges:
16 January, 2012·Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the tribunal erred in passing the impugned judgment and award. He, further, submitted that the tribunal failed to appreciate the fact that the deceased was travelling in a goods vehicle. However, he, fairly, conceded that the said contention was not r...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mukeshkumar vs Union
Judges:
16 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) This petition is moved by the petitioners invoking Articles 14, 16, 19 & 226 of the Constitution of India. Undisputedly, the acquisition proceedings were initiated in the year 1957 and awards were passed in 1959. The petitioners do not dispute to have appropria...
High Court Of Gujarat
Assets vs Official
Judges:
16 January, 2012·When the application is called-out and taken-up for hearing, Mr. Pahwa, learned advocate for the applicant, is not present. On his behalf, a request for pass-over is made. In view of the fact that only the first sitting is available for the matters pertaining to Company Law in view of present roster...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pravinkumar vs Anitaben
Judges:
16 January, 2012·Learned counsel, Mr.Vora, for respondents No.1 to 3 submitted that respondents No.1 to 3 herein have also filed an application under Section 135(3) of the Code of the Criminal Procedure and in that proceedings, present applicant is appearing. However, the applicant herein has not paid the single pie...
High Court Of Gujarat
John vs Union
Judges:
16 January, 2012·On last occasion when matter was called out, learned advocate, Mr.D.P.Joshi was not present. Today also, he is not present when called out. S.O. to 20-1-2012. If learned advocate for the applicant does not remain present on that day also, court will proceed with the matter.[M.D.SHAH,J.] radhan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.