Shankrabhai vs State
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 seeks time.In spite of pendency of the main petition, the trial proceeds detrimental to the interest of the applicant. Prima-facie, a case is made out to stay the trial. Hence, further procee...
High Court Of Gujarat
Popatbhai vs State
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred by the applicants to quash and set aside the impugned FIR.After the matter was argued for sometime and as the investigation is still in progress and it is yet to be concluded by the concerned Investigati...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chhaganbhai vs M. Sahai
Judges:
17 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Heard Mr.Y.J.Patel, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Considering the contents of the application, this Miscellaneous Civil Application is allowed. Civil Application No.8678 of 2011 in LPA Stamp No.1014 of 2011 is restored to file. Learned counsel...
High Court Of Gujarat
Khotabhai vs State
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition at this stage with a view to avail the remedy under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.Permission granted as prayed for. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amrutlal vs State
Judges:
17 January, 2012·1 Rule.Service is waived. Upon the joint request made by the learned advocates for the parties, this matter is taken up for final disposal.2 This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [for short, 'the Code'] is filed by the applicants to quash the FIR being C.R. No.I-...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Meher
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Heard learned APP Miss Shah for the applicant. Leave to appeal is granted. The application stands disposed of accordingly.(BANKIM N.MEHTA, J.) shekhar* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahida vs Hemchandracharya
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Heard learned advocates for the parties. The petitioner by way of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayed as under:"8.A) Admit this petition;B) Allow this petition by issuing a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and thereby be pleased...
High Court Of Gujarat
Patel vs District
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Draft amendment is granted.Mr.Ketan D. Shah, learned advocate for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petition with a liberty to approach appropriate forum.Permission granted. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.Sd/-[R.M.CHHAYA, J ] *** Bhavesh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kiritkumar vs Dahyalal
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Place the matter on 19.01.2012.(N.V.ANJARIA, J.) [sn devu pps] Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dr vs Dy
Judges:
17 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Ms.Kruti Shah, learned counsel for the appellant states that inspite of best efforts, her client has not been able to obtain the notice issued under Section 267 of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993. The copy of notice issued under the aforesaid provisions by ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.