Shilpaben vs State
Judges:
19 January, 2012·Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP.It is submitted that, in the earlier round of litigation, respondent No.2 filed a private complaint, which came to be dismissed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad, vide order dated 30.10.2010 and, in a challenge before the R...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manharlal vs State
Judges:
19 January, 2012·Heard learned senior advocate for the applicants.Notice returnable on 30.1.2012.Direct service is permitted.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Piyushkumar vs Afzalkhan
Judges:
19 January, 2012·Stand over to 30th January 2012. Registry is directed to call for Record and Proceedings of Criminal Case No. 504 of 2003 from the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajpipala so as to reach this Court on or before 27th January 2012.(M.R.SHAH,J.) kaushik Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harsh vs District
Judges:
19 January, 2012·At the request of Mr.Tejas Shukla, learned advocate for Mr. K. B. Pujara, learned advocate for the petitioners, the matter is adjourned to enable him to take instructions in the matter.[N.V. ANJARIA, J.] Amit Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Washing vs Gujarat
Judges:
19 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Rule.Since Mrs Raval waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.1 and Ms Pathak, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service on behalf of respondent No.2, we treat the matter as ready as regards service.After going th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Government Pleader For ... vs 3
Judges:
19 January, 2012·No appearance is filed on behalf of the petitioner though the Notice is already served as per the endorsement. By order dated 19.01.2012, the matter was adjourned for two weeks to enable the petitioner to enter the appearance. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is posted toda...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chandraprakash vs State
Judges:
19 January, 2012·1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the party in person has prayed for the following reliefs:-"(I) Conduct the impugn quasi-judicial process denovo and/or from the place in the condition as & was with new representing officer & new departmental inquiry officer,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kasambhai vs District
Judges:
19 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. We have heard learned advocate Mr.H.D.Dave for the appellant and learned AGP Ms.Jirga Jhaveri for the State.2. Learned AGP Ms.Jirga Jhaveri has raised a preliminary objection that this Letters Patent Appeal is not maintainable as the grievance of the appel...
High Court Of Gujarat
Naresh vs State
Judges:
19 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) By this Public Interest Litigation, a prayer has been made for protecting the possession of the existing hutment dwellers of Ambedkarnagar in the District of Surat and to rehabilitate them under JNNURM or under Regulations for the R...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gulam vs State
Judges:
19 January, 2012·Heard Mr.Gandhi, learned advocate for the applicant. Mr.Raval, learned APP for the respondent - State supplied a report prepared by P.I., Ahmedabad city ACB police station. Mr.Raval, learned APP submitted that some report from the FSL is called for regarding the spectrography test and as soon as the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.