New vs Dineshbhai
Judges:
30 January, 2012·The claim in appeal as well as the amount of compensation are small and therefore this court is not inclined to entertain the present appeal on the ground of smallness of claim. First Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. However, this may not be treated as a precedent. No order as to costs.(K.S.JH...
High Court Of Gujarat
Valsad vs Demosha
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Draft amendment is granted.Notice returnable on 6.3.2012.(K.M.THAKER,J.) Suresh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Through vs Vimlaben
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Rule returnable on 27 th February, 2012.(RAJESH H.SHUKLA, J.) /patil Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pravinbhai vs Brahmani
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Since the appellant is not co-operating in respect of unserved respondents to the learned advocate for the appellant, the appeals stand dismissed for default.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) niru* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mayudinmiya vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants have prayed to release them on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-130 of 2011 registered with Mehmedabad Police Station, for the offence punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468, 4...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chabildas vs Nagindas
Judges:
30 January, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Tanvish Bhatt, learned advocate for the applicant.2. Issue Rule returnable on 27.2.2012.(HARSHA DEVANI, J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Baroda vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Draft amendment granted.Notice returnable on 15.10.2012.In view of decision of this Court in the case of IDBI Bank Ltd. vs. Hytaisun Magnetics Ltd & Ors. reported in 2011(2) GLR 1438, ad-interim relief in terms of para 13(B) is granted. However, it is clarified that the bank may not execute the orde...
High Court Of Gujarat
Poa vs Official
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Learned counsel, Mr.Joshi appearing for the respondent no.2 requests for time stating that the report made by DILR, which submitted to the Court in a sealed cover, may be opened and the copy thereof may be directed to be supplied so that he can take appropriate steps including lodging any objection ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shree vs Union
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Both the advocates for the reasons best known to them have requested for adjournment . When the parties advocates are making request for adjournment, ordinarily the Court shall grant it for genuine reason. Here there is no reason for the Court to infer that it is not a genuine request, hence it is g...
High Court Of Gujarat
Miscellaneous vs Official
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Board shows that notice is not received back qua respondent No.7 and notice is unserved qua respondent No.8.Mr.Rasesh Parikh, learned counsel for the applicant, prayed for fresh Notice qua respondent No.8.Hence, Registry is directed to issue fresh Notice qua respondent No.8, returnable on 12th March...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.