Gsrtc vs Gurmitsingh
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Counsel for the appellant seeks permission to delete respondent No. 2.Permission, as prayed for, is granted. Respondent No. 2 is allowed to be deleted. First appeal is ready to come up for hearing on board on 08.02.2012.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] JYOTI Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahmadmiya vs State
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that considering the nature of allegations and role attributed to the applicant, by imposing suitable conditions, the applicant may be enlarged on bail.Heard learned APP for the respondent - State.Having heard learned counsel for the parties and ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mangalam vs Union
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Draft amendment is granted, the same shall be carried out forthwith.Notice, returnable on 13.02.2012. Direct service is permitted.(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) Pankaj Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rasikbhai vs Director
Judges:
23 January, 2012·The matter was called out in the first session and twice in the second session. Nobody appeared for the petitioner. However, having regard to the fact that the board was notified today morning only, in the interest of justice, matter is required to be adjourned.Learned Assistant Government Pleader h...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhanwarsingh vs Industrial
Judges:
23 January, 2012·1. Heard learned advocate Mr. T. R. Mishra for the petitioner.2. Learned advocate Mr. Mishra has submitted that before the impugned order came to be passed, the petitioner was declared as a protected workman. He also submitted that during the period in question, though the petitioner was a protected...
High Court Of Gujarat
Insurance vs Aavalbhai
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Respondents no. 5 & 7 are served by way of affixing. Thus, all the respondents are served. Heard learned advocates for the parties. In view of the averments made in the application, the delay caused in filing the first appeal is required to be condoned. Accordingly, delay is condoned. Civil applicat...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rameshchandra vs Dahod
Judges:
23 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) This application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is made by the applicant for condonation of delay of 10 days occurred in filing the above Letters Patent Appeal.Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.Considering the submissions and the avermen...
High Court Of Gujarat
Registrar vs Kalindi
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Not before this Court.[N.V. ANJARIA, J.] Amit Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Iqbalbhai vs State
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Notice returnable on 3.2.2012.( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hariram vs State
Judges:
23 January, 2012·This application is preferred by the applicant convict for grant of parole on the ground of repairs of his house at his native village in Andhra Pradesh and also for making financial arrangements towards the same. The applicant convict is convicted for the offences punishable under Section 20(B) of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.