Mathurbhai vs State
Judges:
28 February, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-23 of 2011 registered with Chuda Police Station.[2] It is submitted by the learned advocate for the applicant that c...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abdulmiya vs Abdulbhai
Judges:
28 February, 2012·When the matter is called out, learned advocate for the appellant is not present. Hence, the matter stands dismissed for default.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) niru* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Umar vs State
Judges:
28 February, 2012·The applicant has preferred this application, under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for enlarging him on bail in connection with the offence being CR No. I-10 of 2010 registered with Khawda Police Station, Dist. Kutch, for the offence u/ss. 465, 467, 468, 471, 420, 120(B) and 114 of I...
High Court Of Gujarat
Specific vs Sudesh
Judges:
28 February, 2012·1. It is informed that learned advocate for the applicant has filed leave note. However, since the order which is proposed to be passed in this application will not adversely affect the interest of the applicant, the application is taken up for hearing and for making appropriate order.2. Having rega...
High Court Of Gujarat
Raisinh vs State
Judges:
28 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA) Rule.Learned A.P.P. waives service.The applicant, who is undergoing sentence, has by way of present application, prayed for temporary bail on the ground of engagement of his daughter.It is stated by the applicant in his letter of request that his daughter h...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kishore vs State
Judges:
28 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) The learned counsel Ms.Sacheti states that the appellant herein together with the other co-convict has already filed appeal being Criminal Appeal No.1562/11 on 20.12.2011 and therefore, she seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal together with the a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chandan vs Rule Unserved For
Judges:
28 February, 2012·Fresh notice is ordered to be issued to the respondent at new address to be supplied by learned advocate Mr.S. D. Vasavada for the applicant, returnable on 26th March 2012. Direct service is permitted.[ RAJESH H. SHUKLA, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narendrasinh vs State
Judges:
28 February, 2012·Fresh notice to respondent no. 2 returnable on 14/3/2012. Over and above regular service, service through R.P.A.D is permitted.(J.C.UPADHYAYA, J.) * Pansala.Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Parvatbhai vs General
Judges:
28 February, 2012·1. Rule.Mr.Premal R. Joshi, learned counsel waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondents.2. By way of this application, the applicant-original petitioner seeks to change the names of respondent Nos.1 and 2 as, after the new Act of 2003, the erstwhile Gujarat Electricity Board is replaced by d...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hirenkumar vs Ritaben
Judges:
28 February, 2012·1. This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with provisions of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging the order dated 26.9.2011 passed by learned Additional Senior Civil Jud...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.