Hansiben vs State
Judges:
08 February, 2012·Mr.K.P.Raval, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent no.1-State, upon instruction, being received from Mr.T.N.Malik, Police Inspector, C.I.D. Crime, Gandhinagar, seeks time to produce the progress report of the investigation.S.O.to 16th February,2012.(J.C.UPADHYAYA,J.) Girish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Balubhai vs State
Judges:
08 February, 2012·Learned counsel for the petitioners has concluded her arguments and has also referred to a judgment passed by this Court in Special Civil Application No.3399 of 1997.Learned State counsel has sought time to verify the fact whether any Letters Patent Appeal against this judgment has been preferred.Re...
High Court Of Gujarat
Lilaben vs Executive
Judges:
08 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Rule returnable on 22nd February, 2012. Learned AGP waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents.(Akil Kureshi,J.) (C.L.Soni,J.) an vyas Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Champaben
Judges:
08 February, 2012·By way of this appeal, appellant - Insurance Company has challenged the order dated 20.10.1999 passed in Motor Accident Claims Petition No.710 of 1995, filed under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bharuch, whereby the Tribunal has awarded Rs.1,74...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Jiluben
Judges:
08 February, 2012·In view of the deletion of the original owner, the appeal does not survive and the same stands dismissed in default.(K.S.Jhaveri, J.) *mohd Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shrinath vs Chavda
Judges:
08 February, 2012·It is informed that learned advocate for the petitioner has filed leave-note.The petitioner has brought under challenge, after almost two and half years, award dated 12.05.2009 passed by the Labour Court in Reference (LCA) No.641 of 1999. The belated challenge is taken out by the original opponent N...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yogeshbhai vs Deepikaben
Judges:
08 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Learned Counsel for the applicants seeks time to file rejoinder. S.O. to 14th February, 2012. Learned Counsel for the respondent No.1/A to 1/D stated that till then, said respondents shall not proceed further with the execution proceedings.(Akil Kureshi,J.)...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vishwas vs State
Judges:
08 February, 2012·In both applications, considering the nature of complaint and the allegations levelled therein, upon instructions received from the applicant, the learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw both applications at this stage with liberty to take action in accordance with law before...
High Court Of Gujarat
Official vs M/S
Judges:
08 February, 2012·1. Mr. Shah, learned Advocate appearing for respondent No.1 in Company Application No.399 of 2011 has submitted that in Company Application No.407 of 2011 his client i.e. Shri Jagdish Oil Mills Ltd. has not been impleaded as party and that therefore the said respondent No.1 in Company Application No...
High Court Of Gujarat
Krushna vs State
Judges:
08 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Considering the facts and circumstances and as the paper-book is stated to be ready, the office shall verify the same, and if, the paper-book is ready, the matter shall be listed in the final hearing board in the 3rd week of June, 2012. Application stand di...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.