Yogendrasinh vs Surendranagar
Judges:
28 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) The petitioner seeks to invoke jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the respondents, none of whom is government or instrument of government. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.2. We may add that the petitioner has...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Unknown
Judges:
28 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Admit.Bailable warrant be issued for a sum of Rs.5000/- each.(JAYANT PATEL, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) *bjoy Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sandipsinh vs Unknown
Judges:
28 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.L.SONI) Applicant seeks restoration of the First Appeal (Stamp Number) 3475 of 2011 which came to be dismissed pursuant to order of this Court dated 19.12.2011.Having gone through the contents of the application, we are satisfied with the explanation given by the appli...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gautambhai vs Varshaben
Judges:
28 February, 2012·This Application is brought by the original petitioner as the Opponent no. 1 has passed away and his heirs and legal representatives are required to be brought on the record of the main matter.On having heard learned advocate for the parties and on having examined the death certificate of the Oppone...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Ahmadhussain
Judges:
28 February, 2012·1. In connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 26.02.2005 in which Ratilal @ Ratabha Hakmabhai Dhrangi expired, the legal heirs of deceased preferred claim petition being M.A.C.P. No.192/2007 u/s.163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Banas...
High Court Of Gujarat
Saiyed vs Principal
Judges:
28 February, 2012·1. The learned advocate for the petitioner has moved a draft amendment. The same is granted and may be carried out, forthwith.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 3-1-2012 passed by Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department whereby the application for stay moved by the petitioner along wi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahmedabad vs Ramanbhai
Judges:
28 February, 2012·Para 31 of the decision of the Hon'bel Supreme Court in case of Sarla Verma (Smt) and others versus Delhi Transport Corporation and another reported in (2009) 6 Supreme Court Cases 121 reads as under:"31. Where the deceased was a bachelor and the claimants are the parents, the deduction follows a di...
High Court Of Gujarat
T vs State
Judges:
28 February, 2012·NOTICE returnable on 15.03.2012.It is averred in the petition that though the charge-sheet was filed in 2004, no further action is initiated. The respondents are directed to file affidavit explaining the same by the returnable date.Direct service is permitted.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs None For
Judges:
28 February, 2012·RULE returnable on 19th March 2012.[ RAJESH H.SHUKLA, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narendrakumar vs Manekben
Judges:
28 February, 2012·At the learned made by learned counsel, Mr.Y.V. Brahmbhatt, the matter is adjourned to 13 th March, 2012 as there is a sick-note of learned counsel, Mr.K.V. Shelat.Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till then.(RAJESH H.SHUKLA, J.) /patil Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.