Meghiben vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Mr.Niraj Ashar, learned AGP seeks time to file affidavit in reply. Affidavit in reply shall be filed on or before 27.2.2012. Rejoinder, if any, be filed on or before 29.2.2012. S.O. to 1.3.2012.It is made clear that no further time shall be granted for filing the affidavit in reply as this Court had...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bavabhai vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·On the joint request of the learned counsel for the respective parties, list on 21.02.2012.(Smt. Abhilasha Kumari, J.) rakesh/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajendrakuamr Chimanlal Sevak vs State Of Gujarat Through ...
Judges:
13 February, 2012·At the request of Shri Niraj Sharma, learned Asst. Government Pleader, S.O. to 28.02.2012. Affidavit in reply shall be filed on or before 24.02.2012, the rejoinder, if any, shall be filed on or before 27.02.2012.(R.M.CHHAYA,J) MEHUL HC-NIC Page 1 of 1 Created On Sat Jul 09 01:48:59 IST 2016...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Joginder
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Learned advocate for the appellant seeks permission to delete respondents No. 2 and 3 from the title clause of the appeal. Permission as prayed for is granted. The learned advocate for the appellant is permitted and ordered to delete respondents No. 2 and 3 from the title clause of the appeal. At th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Popsing vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Learned APP Ms.Calla submits, on instructions, that this petition has become infructuous as the detention order is revoked by the competent authority. Hence, this petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged.( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs None For
Judges:
13 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Appeal is admitted and expedited. The appellants shall file paper-book, after which, it would be open for them to seek fixing the date of hearing.(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (C.L.SONI, J.) omkar Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Lilaben vs Premsingh
Judges:
13 February, 2012·In view of the averments made in the application, present application is allowed, in terms of Paragraph No.5(B). Respondent No.1 is ordered to be deleted.Fresh Notice in First Appeal No.762 of 1999 to the respondent No.2, by way of substituted service, returnable on 20.03.2012.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] ..mi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ajit vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Rule.Ms.Shah, learned APP waives service of notice of Rule.The present application is for condonation of delay of 552 days in preferring appeal against the judgement and order passed by the learned Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.156/2009, whereby the co...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bipinkumar vs State
Judges:
13 February, 2012·Heard.1. Rule.Learned APP Mr. Jani waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent No.1 State and learned advocate Mr. I.M. Pandya waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent No.2.2. This Revision Application is preferred by the applicant under Section 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal P...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Appearance
Judges:
13 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The Board shows that one Mr.D.N. Vora appears for respondents no.1 to 8. So far as respondent no.9 is concerned it is mentioned that the appeal stands abated. So far as respondents no.10, 11 and 12 are concerned they are shown to have been served.Learned...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.