Tinaben vs State
Judges:
29 February, 2012·Upon instruction from the applicants, the learned advocate for the applicants seeks permission to withdraw this application at this stage with liberty to avail remedy under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.Permission is granted.This application stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as pra...
High Court Of Gujarat
Siddhi vs Admit
Judges:
29 February, 2012·SIDDHI FINANCE REGISTERED PEDHI'S - ROHIT RASIKLAL MEHTA - Appellant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 - Opponent(s) ========================================================= Appearance :MR HEMANT B RAVAL for Appellant(s) : 1, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Opponent(s) : 1, None for Opponent(s) : 2, ===========...
High Court Of Gujarat
S vs State
Judges:
29 February, 2012·When the Court was not inclined to entertain this petition on the ground of lack of cause of action and maintainability of the petition on the facts mentioned in the petition, though in support of his submission learned counsel has cited judgment in case of S.M.D. Kiran Pasha Vs. Government of Andhr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sabugar vs Somabhai
Judges:
29 February, 2012·Mr.R.K Mansuri learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the parties have amicably settled the dispute, in view of that he seeks permission to withdraw the petition.Permission is granted. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Interim relief if any stands vacated.(Ms.Sonia Gokani...
High Court Of Gujarat
Faijmohd vs State
Judges:
29 February, 2012·The applicant has filed this application for granting parole of fifteen days for the reason that he wants to approach the Apex Court for filing an appeal.The record shows that earlier also the applicant was granted fifteen days' parole on the same ground. The applicant was absconding for 2368 days a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dilavarbhai vs State
Judges:
29 February, 2012·Time to deposit is extended upto 2.3.2012.Issue fresh notice to respondent Nos. 2 to 4 returnable on 16.3.2012, to be served through the In-charge police officer of the police station in which area respondent Nos. 2 to 4 reside.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ushaben vs Dharamjeevan
Judges:
29 February, 2012·Notice returnable on 14.03.2012.It is also made clear that as the matter pertains to denial of condonation of delay by the Tribunal, the Court may dispose of the matter on the returnable date. Direct service is permitted.(R.M.CHHAYA, J.) Hitesh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajeshkumar vs Designated
Judges:
29 February, 2012·In the light of the fact that the main petition being Special Civil Application No.8998 of 2011 has been disposed of, this application for interim relief does not survive and is disposed of as having become infructuous.[HARSHA DEVANI, J.] parmar* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vikramji vs State
Judges:
29 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) Rule returnable on 01.03.2012. State to verify the genuineness of the ground and antecedents of the convict.(JAYANT PATEL, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) *bjoy Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Aadambhai vs Fatmaben
Judges:
29 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) This is an application for condonation of delay of 8 days in filing Letters Patent Appeal.Heard learned counsel for the parties.Considering the contents of the application, it cannot be said that the delay caused in filing the appeal has remained totally une...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.