Mangaliben vs Anand
Judges:
24 February, 2012·Since, the application made by the applicants is not as per the Roaster of this Court.The Office is directed to place this matter before appropriate Court.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] ..mitesh..Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Indiraben
Judges:
24 February, 2012·Matter is ready. To be listed for final hearing on 02.03.2012.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) niru* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sursez vs Diamond
Judges:
24 February, 2012·Draft amendment is granted, same shall be carried out forthwith.Notice to the respondents returnable on 12/3/2012. Notice be processed only after the draft amendment is carried out. Direct service permitted.[ S.R. BRAHMBHATT, J ] /vgn Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jiviben vs State
Judges:
24 February, 2012·On information learned APP submits that trial is on verge of completion and only three witnesses is to be examined.At this stage, learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application.Permission granted as prayed for. Matter stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhirajbhai Saujibhai Paralia & 2 vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges:
24 February, 2012·Heard Mr.Kapadia, learned advocate for the applicants and Mr.Raval, learned APP for the respondent No.1-State. Mr.Kapadia, learned advocate took me through the copy of FIR as well as other relevant papers annexed with this application pertaining to the proceedings, which were concluded by Revenue De...
High Court Of Gujarat
Satyavirsinh vs State
Judges:
24 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA) Rule.Learned A.P.P. waives service.The applicant, who is undergoing sentence, has by way of present application, prayed for temporary bail on the ground that his mother is required to undergo operation.It is stated by the applicant that his aged widow mothe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kumari vs Principal
Judges:
24 February, 2012·Draft amendment is granted. To be carried out forthwith.NOTICE returnable on 07.03.2012.Mr.A.D. Oza, learned advocate for the petitioner has specifically raised a contention that while taking such a drastic step, the petitioner is not heard. The respondents are directed to file affidavit in reply on...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Malhotra
Judges:
24 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) It appears that this Civil Application has become infructuous in view of the fact that in the original order the petitioner was directed to make an application within a fortnight from the date of passing of the order with all suppor...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dimple vs State
Judges:
24 February, 2012·Rule.Office is directed to call for Record and Proceedings from the concerned Court.(Z.K. Saiyed, J) Anup Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mohmad vs State
Judges:
24 February, 2012·Shri Chauhan, learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition at this stage, with a liberty to file fresh petition either before this Court or before the appropriate authority. In view of this, permission as sought for is granted. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.