Heard Mr.Kapadia, learned advocate for the applicants and Mr.Raval, learned APP for the respondent No.1-State. Mr.Kapadia, learned advocate took me through the copy of FIR as well as other relevant papers annexed with this application pertaining to the proceedings, which were concluded by Revenue Department as well as the relevant sale- deeds. He also relied upon a case of Madan Mohan Singh Vs.State of Gujarat reported in 2010(3) GLH
270. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced by Mr.Kapadia, learned advocate for the applicants, rule, returnable on 28.03.2012. Mr.Raval, learned APP appears and waives service of rule for respondent No.1. Interim relief in terms of paragraph 6(B) is granted.
(J.C.UPADHYAYA, J.) CR.MA/11489/2011 2/2 ORDER (binoy)