State Of Gujarat Thro Deputy Secretary &
Judges: A J Desai
04 December, 2012·1. By filing present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the order of detention dated 29.8.2012 passed against the detenu by the respondent No. 2, in exercise of power under sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Guj...
High Court Of Gujarat
District Magistrate Shri Office Of District &
Judges: A J Desai
04 December, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 12.9.2012 passed by respondent No.1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “bootlegger” as defined und...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat Thro Secretary &
Judges: A J Desai
04 December, 2012·1. By filing present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the order of detention dated 27.09.2012 passed against the detenu by the respondent No. 2, in exercise of power under sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Gujarat Pr...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat &
Judges: A J Desai
04 December, 2012·1. By filing present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the order of detention dated 28.09.2012 passed against the detenu by the respondent No. 2, in exercise of power under sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Gujarat Pr...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat &
Judges: A J Desai
04 December, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 16.06.2012 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “bootlegger” as defined un...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ushaben vs State
Judges: Vijay Manohar S G Shah, S G Shah
04 December, 2012·(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI) Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.4 to 7 Mr.K.M.Antani prays for a weeks time to file Affidavit-in-reply. List on 12.12.2012.(V.M.SAHAI, J.) (S.G.SHAH, J.) (binoy) Page 1 of 1...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amarkaur W vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges:
04 December, 2012·Notice returnable on 27.12.2012. Ms. Raval, learned APP waives service of Notice on behalf of respondent.(K.M.THAKER, J.) suresh Page 1 of 1 CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION/17016/2012 25/06/2014 05:03:46 PM...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mustakim Yasinbhai Pipadwala & vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges:
04 December, 2012·Heard Mr. Kogje, learned advocate for the applicants, and Mr. R.C.Kodekar, learned APP, for the respondent - State.Notice returnable on 13.12.2012.Mr. Kodekar, learned APP, waives service of notice for the respondent - State.(K.M.THAKER, J.) kdc Page 1 of 1...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ambubhai Kamabhai Baraiya vs State
Judges: K M Thaker
04 December, 2012·Learned APP has submitted and it also appears from the record that the petitioner has annexed to the petition documents which are not related to the case in connection with which the petitioner has made grievance in present petition. Learned counsel for petitioner admitted the mistake and requested ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Naresh Agarsinh Chhara @ Nariyo & 2 vs State Of Gujarat & ...
Judges:
04 December, 2012·(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) In this appeal, the judgment and order under challenge is the same, which is challenged in Criminal Appeal No.1713/2012. That appeal is admitted by this Court by order dated 26/11/2012. Heard Mr. Panchal- learned Special Public Prosecutor on behalf of re...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.