State Of Gujarat &
Judges: K M Thaker
30 April, 2012·Heard Mr. Supehia, learned advocate for the petitioner, and Mr. Raval, learned AGP, for the respondent – State. 1.1 Rule.1.2 In the facts and circumstances of present case and in view of the fact that the petitioner relies on the order dated 31.3.2009 passed in Special Civil Application No.2146 of 2...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat &
Judges: K M Thaker
30 April, 2012·Heard Mr. Supehia, learned advocate for the petitioner, and Mr. Raval, learned AGP, for the respondent – State. 1.1 Rule.1.2 In the facts and circumstances of present case and in view of the fact that the petitioner relies on the order dated 31.3.2009 passed in Special Civil Application No.2146 of 2...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Unknown
Judges:
30 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Admit.Bailable warrant be issued for a sum of Rs.5000/- to each of the accused.To be heard with Criminal Appeal No.75 of 2012 and allied appeals.(JAYANT PATEL, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sheeladevi vs None For
Judges:
30 April, 2012·In view of the averments made in the applications, the applications are allowed. The prayer in terms of paragraph Nos.5(A) and (B) is granted.[ K S JHAVERI, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
International vs Gitaben
Judges:
30 April, 2012·Rule.In the meantime, ad-interim relief qua 50% backwages is granted on condition that the respondent workman shall be reinstated in service within a period of thirty days from today.It is clarified that if the workman is not reinstated within the prescribed period, it shall be open to the responden...
High Court Of Gujarat
Purushottam vs Maniben
Judges:
30 April, 2012·1. RULE.Shri U.M. Shastri, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent-heir and legal representatives of the original respondent.2. He has stated at the bar that he shall file the Vakalatnama on behalf of the heir of the original respondent.3. In the facts and circu...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rathva vs Borase
Judges:
30 April, 2012·1. The applicant has prayed for below mentioned relief:"15(B) The Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent nos.1 to 7 to join the applicants as a party respondent Nos.3 to 24 in Special Civil Application No.8396 of 2011 in the interest of justice."2. Heard learned advocate Mr. Desai for...
High Court Of Gujarat
The vs Unknown
Judges:
30 April, 2012·1. Present application has been preferred by the applicants for the following main reliefs in para 3 :-"(a). Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow this application.(b) To issue the appropriate direction for compliance of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 28.09.2010 passed in Special C...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayesh vs Rajnikant
Judges:
30 April, 2012·1. By way of these appeals, the appellants have challenged the judgement and award dated 31.07.1997 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Ahmedabad in M.A.C.P Nos. 321 & 322 of 1986 whereby the Tribunal directed the original opponents to jointly pay compensation of Rs. 72,300/- & Rs. 60,000/-...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arjan vs Ramji
Judges:
30 April, 2012·1. By way of this appeal, the appellants-original claimant have challenged the judgement and award dated 31.12.1999 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Auxi), Morbi, in M.A.C.P. No.135 of 1990, whereby the tribunal has awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.1,56,880/- to the claimant with in...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.