Momin vs None For
Judges:
18 April, 2012·In view of the averments made in the application, the application stands allowed. The prayer made in paragraph No.4(a) and (b) is granted.Fresh notice returnable on 12th June 2012.[ K. S. JHAVERI, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pragnesh vs State
Judges:
18 April, 2012·1. By this application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code'), the applicants seek quashing of the first information report registered vide Navrangpura Police Station I-C.R. No.139/2007 which has now been transferred to Crime Branch, Ahmedab...
High Court Of Gujarat
Conrolling vs Rule Not Recd Back For
Judges:
18 April, 2012·In view of the fact that the amount is deposited with the authority as per the order dated 21.03.2012 passed by this Court, the same shall be transmitted to this Court by the authority. The Registry of this Court to invest by way of Fixed Deposit with a nationalized bank initially for a period of th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kanaiyalal vs State
Judges:
18 April, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Majmudar, learned advocate for the petitioner.2. Mr. Majmudar learned advocate for the petitioner, has placed reliance in the case between Abhijit Ghosh Dastidar v. Union of India & Ors. [(2009) 16 SCC 146] and he has also placed reliance on the order dated 28.11.2011 passed in Special ...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Rajendrakumar
Judges:
18 April, 2012·1. This appeal has been preferred against the award dated 17.9.2007, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Aux.) Fast Track Court No.9, Nadiad, in M.A.C.P. No. 1628 of 2005, whereby the Tribunal has awarded interim compensation in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- to the claimant with interest at the r...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs After
Judges:
18 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Issue NOTICE, returnable on May 2, 1012.After hearing the learned advocate for the petitioners and after going through the materials on record, we find that the petitioners have made out a strong prima facie case to have an interim ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Jamba
Judges:
18 April, 2012·1. The appellant herein has challenged the award dated 09.08.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Kachchh- Bhuj in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 167 of 1993 so far as the Tribunal awarded Rs. 2,24,000/- by way of compensation to the original claimants along with 9% interest.2. It i...
High Court Of Gujarat
Commissioner vs Cora
Judges:
18 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the averments made in the application, we allow this application by fixing the main appeal on April 25, 2012 at 2.30 p.m. (BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, ACTING CJ.) (...
High Court Of Gujarat
Minaxiben Rameshbhai Purohit W vs State Of Gujarat & 2
Judges:
18 April, 2012·Mr. Rawal, learned AGP, has requested for time to file reply affidavit against the case made out by the petitioner and to demonstrate that in the facts of the case, the income of the family and the amount paid towards retiral benefits to the deceased deserve to be taken into account and the request ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vodafone vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
18 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Let the matters appear on May 4, 2012. Interim relief granted earlier be extended till then.[BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, ACTING CJ.] [J.B.PARDIWALA, J.] pirzada/-Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.