Himanshu vs Somabhai
Judges:
19 April, 2012·Rule.With the consent of the parties, today the matter is taken-up for final hearing. Respondent No.2 is allowed to be deleted.By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the order dated 16.12.2011 passed by the Workmen Compensation Commissioner (Dahod), by which learne...
High Court Of Gujarat
Raj vs The
Judges:
19 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)1. The applicant-original petitioner of Special Criminal Application No.3432 of 2011 has filed this contempt petition alleging that respondent No.4-Gujarat Agro Industries Corporation has not complied with the directions issued by the learned Single Judge in...
High Court Of Gujarat
Afron vs State
Judges:
19 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) By this application under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged an order dated July 12, 2011 passed by the Gujarat Pollution Control Board, thereby directing closure of the unit of the petitioner.In view of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhaniben vs Dhanabhai
Judges:
19 April, 2012·1. By way of these appeals, the appellants have challenged the award dated 01.08.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux) at Junagadh in MACT Case No. 557, 635, 558, 560, 1116 of 1999 whereby the Tribunal awarded compensation alongwith interest and costs payable by the original oppone...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amrutbhai vs State
Judges:
19 April, 2012·Shri Mehta, learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is already put up unconditional apology dated 11.04.2012 and today the petitioner is present in person and he is seeking unconditional apology from the Court for the incorrect averments inadvertently made in the petition and those averments w...
High Court Of Gujarat
Stateof vs Mr Jk Shah App For
Judges:
19 April, 2012·In this case, the applicant is not named as an accused or witness at this stage.In view of the above, apprehension of the applicant of any nature is misconceived and no direction as prayed for can be given, keeping it open for the applicant to pursue the remedy before the Investigating Agency or bef...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rawal vs State
Judges:
19 April, 2012·This application is filed by the applicant under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure apprehending his arrest in connection with C.R.No.I-41 of 2012 registered with Vijapur Police Station for the offence under Sections 409 of the Indian Penal Code.This Court has gone through the complaint. ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Revaben vs State
Judges:
19 April, 2012·Heard Mr.N.K.Majmudar, learned advocate for the petitioners and Mr.Shital R.Patel, learned advocate for respondents Nos.6 and 7 (Caveators).Issue notice, returnable on 11-6-2012.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari,J) arg Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat & vs Mr Jk Shah App For
Judges:
19 April, 2012·[1] Learned advocate for the applicants would submit that the applicants are bona fide purchasers of the subject land of the complaint and further legal heirs of the owner including HUF Manager and the complainant were paid the amount agreed by cheque and further amount of Rs.10 Lakhs was also paid ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.