Naresh vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·Recently the present applicant - convict prisoner is convicted. As per the police information, if the convict is released, there is all possibility of breach of peace. The statements of the complainant side were recorded. In view of the above, this application is rejected.(M.D.SHAH, J.) (binoy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Surendramani vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·Learned Advocate Shri Sumit B.Sikarwar for the applicants seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Permission, as sought for is granted. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) Pankaj Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ranubha vs The
Judges:
20 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Since the main appeal is on Board and likely to be disposed of soon, application is disposed of without any orders.(A L DAVE, J.) (N V ANJARIA, J.) sompura Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Imtiaz vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Delay of 10 days is in preferring the appeal is condoned and Rule is made absolute with no order as to costs.(D.H.Waghela,J) (Mohinder Pal,J) pathan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Paryavaran vs Union
Judges:
20 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) In view of the amendment of the petition, the petitioner is directed to add Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Gujarat, as additional respondent.Issue notice on the newly added respondent. Since Mr. Rashesh Randani, l...
High Court Of Gujarat
D vs Surat
Judges:
20 April, 2012·Mr.Ankit Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner states, upon instructions, that the petitioner is desirous of giving up the challenge to the impugned order to the extent that it cancels the allotment of land in favour of the petitioner. He, however, states that the respondent-Surat Urban Developm...
High Court Of Gujarat
Devendraprasad vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·As all these applications are preferred by common applicant - accused with respect to different similar criminal complaint/cases filed against him, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order.All these applications are filed by the applicant - original accused named Devendrapr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tata vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of the State respondent submits that since the amendment relates to pure question of law, there is no necessity to file affidavit dealing with the averments made in the amendment applicat...
High Court Of Gujarat
Noormohmad vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·This application has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to release the applicant on regular bail in connection with CR No.I-39 of 2011 registered with Khambhat City Police Station, Anand, for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120-B and 34 of the India...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pooja vs Sarpanch
Judges:
20 April, 2012·Mr.Niral R. Mehta, learned advocate for respondents Nos.1 and 2 submits that he has prepared an affidavit on behalf of the said respondents regarding the inspection conducted at the spot on 01.03.2012, in presence of all the concerned parties. He, therefore, prays for time in order to file the same ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.