Manguben vs State
Judges:
30 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) In light of the fact that application under Section 97 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the present petitioner is pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dhandhuka, learned advocate for the petitioner does not press this petition...
High Court Of Gujarat
Magan vs State
Judges:
30 April, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 19.12.2011 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short" the Act) by detaining the detenu as a "bootlegger" as defined under Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Savitaben vs Imtiyazbhai
Judges:
30 April, 2012·This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 1070 days in preferring First Appeal (Stamp) No. 806 of 2010.In view of the averments made in the application the same is allowed in terms of para 7(B). Delay of 1070 days is condoned. Rule is made abso...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rafique vs None For
Judges:
30 April, 2012·RULE.The order of continuity of service is stayed on condition that the respondents shall be reinstated in service within 30 days. Notice as to interim relief returnable on 11th May 2012. Direct service is permitted.[ K. S. JHAVERI, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manoj vs Deviyani
Judges:
30 April, 2012·Mr.Pathak, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner tenders rejoinder which is taken on record.S.O.to 10.05.2012.Mr.Pathak, learned counsel shall inform the respondent about the next date of hearing by courier and/or by speed-post.(R.M.CHHAYA, J.) Hitesh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rule Served For Respondent(S) : 1 - ... vs 2
Judges:
30 April, 2012·1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Yes judgment?2 To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the No judgment?4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to No the interpretation of the constitution of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jammu vs Saatchi
Judges:
30 April, 2012·1. By way of this application, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs :"(A) The Hon'ble Court may be pleased to admit and grant this Civil Application.(B) The Hon'ble Court may be pleased to implead the applicant as party respondent in Company Petition No. 25 of 2011.(C) The Hon'ble Cour...
High Court Of Gujarat
Anchor vs M/S
Judges:
30 April, 2012·Heard Mr. P.A. Jadeja, learned advocate for the respondent. Mr. Ramnandan Singh, learned advocate for the petitioner is absent.As such this petition was tagged along with Company Petition No.97 of 2005. However, as per the order passed today in Company Petition No.97 of 2005, the parties of the said...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sakarali vs State
Judges:
30 April, 2012·Considering the role of the applicant since he was present in the scene of offence, it will be open for the investigating officer to investigate the offence so registered. However, qua the applicant no further investigation by carried out for the offences under Sections 307 of Indian Penal Code till...
High Court Of Gujarat
Usmanbhai vs Unknown
Judges:
30 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Mr.Dewal, learned Counsel for the applicant, states that the applicant is not contemplating to file any application for suspension of sentence and regular bail in near future. Admit. To be heard with Criminal Appeal No.513 of 2012.(Jayant Patel, J.) (Paresh...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.