Jaushriben vs State
Judges:
24 April, 2012·The explanation rendered by Registrar (Judicial) dated 23.4.2012 indirectly amounts usurping jurisdiction of this Court vested under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and the decisions relied on have no relevance whatsoever and the Registrar (Judicial) has entered into an arena of ju...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs Mr Sp Hasurkar For
Judges:
24 April, 2012·1 The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is arising from an Order dated 3.3.2005 passed by the learned Auxiliary Chamber Judge, City Civil Court No.17, Ahmedabad, below Exhibit-9 in Summary Suit No. 2274 of 2003.2 The present petitioner, being a Cooperative Bank, filed a Summary ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Muktaben vs United
Judges:
24 April, 2012·1. The appellants herein have challenged the award dated 22.10.2003 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jamnagar in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 335 of 1995 so far as the Tribunal awarded only Rs. 2,53,000/- as compensation with interest and costs.2. It is the case of the appellant t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mehrab vs State
Judges:
24 April, 2012·At the request of learned advocate for respondent No.2-complainant, time is granted as prayed for. The matter is adjourned to 13.6.2012.Meanwhile, no coercive action be taken against the applicant qua the impugned FIR.Direct service is permitted.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajendrasinh vs State
Judges:
24 April, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mr. Jadeja for learned advocate Mr. Majmudar for the applicant.It is submitted that the accused gave undertaking to pay the amount advanced to the other borrowers including himself and pursuant to that the cheque in question was given and hence the trial Court committed error ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayshreeben vs State
Judges:
24 April, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Mankad, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Shah, learned A.G.P.2. Learned A.G.P. has referred to the details of calculation of amount paid to the petitioners (page 216 and 217). The statement at page 216 and 217 demonstrates the details about the amounts paid to the petitioner...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pandit vs Fee
Judges:
24 April, 2012·1. Learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the reasons recorded at the time of hearing of petition on 13.3.2012 still continue. On the same ground he has requested that the hearing of the petitions may be adjourned. He also submitted that the proceedings before the Hon'ble Division Be...
High Court Of Gujarat
Songadh vs Ashokbhai
Judges:
24 April, 2012·Considering the fact that both the civil applications i.e. Civil Application No.4109 of 2012 and Civil Application No.13735 of 2011 raised an important question pertaining to applicability of Section-17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, present petition is fixed for hearing in the week beginning fro...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shabbir vs Saberabibi
Judges:
24 April, 2012·Learned advocate Mr. Ravi Shah states that he has instruction to appear for the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and some time may be given. The matter is, therefore, adjourned to 28.6.2012. Interim relief granted earlier, to continue till then.(RAJESH H. SHUKLA, J.) ynvyas Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.