Krunal vs Mr Ashok K Padia For
Judges:
25 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) [1] The present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 13 days caused in preferring the criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 06.05.2011 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad in Sessions Case No.48 of 2009.[2] Considerin...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Appearance
Judges:
25 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) Though notice is served none appears for the respondents- original accused. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr.L.R. Pujari requests that fresh process be issued with a permission to effect direct service. Permission is granted. The Registry is ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vishalbhai vs State
Judges:
25 April, 2012·[1] Rule.Learned APP Mr.L.B.Dabhi waives the service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.[2] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I - 27 of 2012 re...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Appearance
Judges:
25 April, 2012·Heard learned APP Miss Shah for the appellant.ADMIT.Bailable warrant be issued in the sum of Rs.5000/- against the respondent No.1.(BANKIM.N.MEHTA, J.) shekhar* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Paschim vs Sardar
Judges:
25 April, 2012·Notice returnable on 07.05.2012.In the meantime and till the returnable date the order impugned shall remain stayed. However, it would be open to the respondent no.1 to approach the Court for vacation and/or modification of this order, even prior to the returnable date. It will be open to him to app...
High Court Of Gujarat
Parshottambhai vs Milanbhai
Judges:
25 April, 2012·Issue notice returnable on 8th May, 2012. Direct service is permitted.(Ms.Sonia Gokani,J) bina Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Khaleel vs State
Judges:
25 April, 2012·Issue notice returnable on 1.5.2012.No coercive action be taken against applicant Nos. 3, 5, and 6.To be heard with Special Criminal Application No.1133 of 2012.Learned APP waives service on behalf of the State.Direct service is permitted qua the private respondent.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Krishak vs Chemical
Judges:
25 April, 2012·Fresh notice to unserved respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4 returnable on 9.5.2012. Over and above the usual mode of service, the applicants are also additionally permitted to serve the said respondents by Registered Speed Post Acknowledgment Due. Direct service permitted.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya,J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pradip vs New
Judges:
25 April, 2012·Shri Majmudar, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant does not press the present application. Hence, the present application is dismissed as not pressed. No cost.(M.R.SHAH, J.) siji Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Osman vs None For
Judges:
25 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA)1. The appellant has invoked Clause 15 of the Letters Patent for calling into question order dated 9.11.2011 in Special Civil Application No.7095 of 2011 of learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the petition of the appellant is dismissed with the observa...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.