Dhiyaben vs Lakhman
Judges:
30 April, 2012·1. By way of this appeal, the appellants-original claimants have challenged the judgement and award dated 23.12.1999, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Auxiliary), Dhrangadhra, in M.A.C.P. No.66 of 1998(old M.A.C.P. No.387 of 1990), whereby the tribunal has awarded compensation in the sum...
High Court Of Gujarat
Unimark vs Gujarat
Judges:
30 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) After some preliminary arguments regarding broad contours of the case, there was a limited controversy to the extent that an application, being Civil Application No. 9630/2008, was already filed by the appellant, practically for the relief which is now reall...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vikramsinh vs State
Judges:
30 April, 2012·Heard learned advocates for the parties.Rule.Learned APP, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.1 and Mr. Satyen Rawal, learned advocate, for respondent No.2.In view of what is recorded in the earlier order dated 29.12.2011, interim relief to continue till further order.[ANANT S. DAVE, J...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gitaben vs Parakramsinh
Judges:
30 April, 2012·Present application has been filed for seeking condonation of delay of 580 days in preferring First Appeal (Stamp) No. 362 of 2012.In view of the averments made in the application the same is allowed in terms of para 2(A). Delay of 580 days in preferring the first appeal is condoned. Rule is made ab...
High Court Of Gujarat
Official vs Icici
Judges:
30 April, 2012·It is reported that Dr. Amee Yajnik, learned Counsel for Official Liquidator is sick and Mr. Oza, learned Counsel for respondent No.4 has filed leave note. Hence, S.O. to 01.05.2012.Sd/-(R.M. Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mr vs Union Of India
Judges:
30 April, 2012·Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the action of respondent No.2 of applying seal to the consignment/container of the petitioner scheduled for export from the Port of Mumbai is absolutely unjust, unreasonable and arbitrary and, that too, on th basis of suspicion of the informant a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Patel vs Joint
Judges:
30 April, 2012·This application has been filed with a prayer to permit the applicants (original petitioners) to delete opponents Nos.7/1/1, 7/1/2 and 7/1/3, from the petition.Heard Mr.Tejas P.Satta, learned advocate for the applicants, Mr.Neeraj Soni, learned Assistant Government Pleader, for respondents Nos.1 and...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kalyanbhai vs Mahendrabhai
Judges:
30 April, 2012·1. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, with the following prayers:"(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow this petition;(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a appropriate writ, order of direction and quashed and set aside the impugned or...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chiman vs State
Judges:
30 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL)1. Rule.Learned APP, Mr.Pandya, waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent - State.2. The present application has been preferred by the applicant - convict for temporary bail, who had sustained injury on account of collapsing of a portion of the slab ins...
High Court Of Gujarat
Miscellaneous vs Sabarkantha
Judges:
30 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 16.8.2011 of learned single Judge of this Court in SCA No.7289 of 2011, which petition of the appellant is dismissed on twin grounds of the petitioner having not availed the alternative remedy and having approach...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.