N Natarajan And Others vs / By Inspector Of Police
Judges: G Jayachandran
21 September, 2017·The appellants in Crl.A.No.956 of 2002 are arrayed as A5, A7 and A8; the appellant in Crl.A.No.984 of 2002 is arrayed as A2; the appellant in Crl.A.No.998 of 2002 is arrayed as A1; the appellant in Crl.A.No.991 of 2002 is arrayed as A3 and the appellant in Crl.A.No.1008 of 2002 is arrayed as A6 in C...
Madras High Court
Mrs S Sugunabharathi vs The Government Of Tamilnadu And Others
Judges: V Parthiban
21 September, 2017·The petitioner has come forward before this Court seeking the following relief:''To issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.4845/L2/2009 dated 27.02.2009 and quash the same and direct the 3rd and 4th respondents...
Madras High Court
Rajendran vs Ettammal
Judges:
21 September, 2017·5.The Assistant Engineer Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Mudalaipatti Village & Post, Namakkal Taluk.PRAYER in CRP (PD) No.3081/2014: Civil Revision Petition filed under <act id=zbGxPokB_szha0nWKNIH section=227>Article 227 </act>of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order of the l...
Madras High Court
R Rajendran vs The District Collector Krishnagiri District And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
21 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.09.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.29351 of 2005 and WPMP.No.32171 of 2005 R. Rajendran ..Petitioner Vs.1. The District Collector Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri2. The Deputy Director of Health Se...
Madras High Court
E Vijayalakshmi vs The District Collector And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
21 September, 2017·Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner an...
Madras High Court
S J Dharanipathy vs The State Of Tamilnadu By The Secretary To Government School Education Fort St George Chennai 600 109 And Others
Judges: P D Audikesavalu
21 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.09.2017 CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU W.P.No.21430 of 2007 S.J.Dharanipathy ... Petitioner Vs.1. The State of Tamilnadu By the Secretary to Government School Education Fort St. George Chennai - 600 10...
Madras High Court
G Dhayala Ragavendran vs The Commissioner Corporation Of Chennai Rippon Buildings Chennai Chairperson/Zonal Executive Engineer ( Zone 13 ) ( The Township Vending Committee ) Corporation Of Chenai Adyar Chennai 600 020 ,The Chairperson/Zonal Executive Engineer ( Zone 13 ) ( The Township Vending Committee ) Corporation Of Chenai Adyar Chennai 600 020
Judges: M Duraiswamy
21 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.09.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.25366 of 2017 G.Dhayala Ragavendran ... Petitioner v.1 The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Rippon Buildings Chennai 600 0032 The Chairperson/Zonal Executive Engineer (Z...
Madras High Court
D Raji vs The Revenue Divisional Officer And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
21 September, 2017·Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.http://www.judis.nic.in2. The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respond...
Madras High Court
R Sundari And Others vs The State Of Tamilnadu And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
21 September, 2017·When the above writ petition was posted for hearing on 13.09.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was posted today “for dismissal”.2.Even today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. Co...
Madras High Court
M/S T C S Textiles Private Limited vs The State Of Tamil Nadu And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
21 September, 2017·The petitioner has filed this writ petition, challenging the impugned letter No.SE/CEDC/S/CBE/AO/R/A1/HTSC 242/03 DATED 25.12.2003 issued by the 4th respondent to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant exemption from leying additional tax under the Tamil Nadu Electricity (Ta...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.