United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Achudhan R Others
Judges: S Vimala
12 September, 2017·THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALACivil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1295 of 2016 and Cross Objection No.63 of 2016 and C.M.P.Nos.19921 & 9939 of 2016 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Office No.I, 104-A Peramanur Main Road, Salem 636 007 ... Appellant in CMA No.1295/2016 & R-1 in Cross Obj. ...
Madras High Court
S Kathhiravan vs The Commandant Office Of The Digp Group Center And Others
Judges: S Manikumar, M Dhandapani
12 September, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.DHANDAPANI,J.) This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge made in W.P.No.22696 of 2017 filed by the appellant/ writ petitioner seeking Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from proceeding with the departmental pro...
Madras High Court
Crl.O.P.No.18911 Of 2017 vs The State Represented By
Judges:
12 September, 2017·This petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent to register the complaint dated 17.04.2017 made by the petitioner to the first respondent.2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents.3.The griev...
Madras High Court
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras ... vs Ramaiah
Judges:
12 September, 2017·The petitioner is the son of Late.Kaliappan. It is found that the first respondent / plaintiff has levied the suit, in O.S.No.254 of 2004, against the petitioner and other legal heirs of the deceased Kaliappan, for recovery of money. It is found that the said suit had ended in a decree in favour of ...
Madras High Court
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras ... vs The Commissioner-Cum-Estate ...
Judges:
12 September, 2017·As against the petitioner in C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.1336 of 2017, it is found that proceedings were initiated by the respondent, who is the petitioner in C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.1202 of 2017, under the Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1975, (hereinafter, referred to as ?th...
Madras High Court
C Nadankannu vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Its Secretary To Government Home ( Police Iv ) Department And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
12 September, 2017·Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition since the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous and she has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petition...
Madras High Court
The Special Commissioner Land ... vs S.Duraikannu
Judges:
12 September, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN,J.] The official respondents in W.P.No.4892 of 2013/appellants, aggrieved by the impugned order dated 18.02.2016 passed in W.P.No.4892 of 2013, in and by which, the respondent/writ petitioner was declared that he was entitled to the benefit of the Ta...
Madras High Court
P.Jawaharlal Pandian vs The District Collector
Judges:
12 September, 2017·By the consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is taken for final disposal.2.The present writ petition has been filed seeking Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to regularize the suspension period of the petitioner from 18.06.2013 to 21.05.2017 as continuing period of service and als...
Madras High Court
Sasikala And Others vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police
Judges: A D Jagadish Chandira
12 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 12.09.2017CORAMTHE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.29952 of 2011and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 20111. Sasikala2. Shakthi ... Petitioners Vs State Rep.by the Inspector of Police, W4 All Women Police Station, Poonamal...
Madras High Court
P.Sanapathi vs The Madurai Zonal Joint Registrar
Judges:
12 September, 2017·By consent of both sides, this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.3.The petitioner has come to this Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the 4th respondent to rein...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.